Study2020

The Impact of a Dairy Milk Recovery Beverage on Bacterially Stimulated Neutrophil Function and Gastrointestinal Tolerance in Response to Hypohydration Inducing Exercise Stress

Costa RJS, Camões-Costa V, Snipe RMJ, Dixon D, Russo I, Huschtscha Z

International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism · 13 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2020-05-27 · Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab · vol. 30 · issue 4 · pp. 237–248
Publisher
Human Kinetics
Cited
13 citations · more than 81% of similar papers · 1.2× the field average
References
49 works
Access
Open access (repository copy) · CC-BY
Research areas
Exercise and Physiological Responses · Thermoregulation and physiological responses · Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
Medicine, Venous blood, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Gastrointestinal function, Animal science, Biology
MeSH
neutrophils, milk, animals, humans, hydrocortisone, leukocyte elastase, exercise, running, adult, male, fatty acid-binding proteins, chocolate, food intolerance

6 authors

From AU, GB

  • Ricardo J. S. CostaAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute; Monash University
  • Vera Camões‐CostaAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute; Monash University
  • Rhiannon M. J. SnipeDeakin University
  • David J. DixonWrittle University College
  • Isabella RussoAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute; Monash University
  • Zoya HuschtschaAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute; Monash University

Abstract

The study aimed to determine the impact of a dairy milk recovery beverage immediately after endurance exercise on leukocyte trafficking, neutrophil function, and gastrointestinal tolerance markers during recovery. Male runners (N = 11) completed two feeding trials in randomized order, after 2 hr of running at 70% V˙O2max, fluid restricted, in temperate conditions (25 °C, 43% relative humidity). Immediately postexercise, the participants received a chocolate-flavored dairy milk beverage equating to 1.2 g/kg body mass carbohydrate and 0.4 g/kg body mass protein in one trial, and water volume equivalent in another trial. Venous blood and breath samples were collected preexercise, postexercise, and during recovery to determine the leukocyte counts, plasma intestinal fatty acid binding protein, and cortisol concentrations, as well as breath H2. In addition, 1,000 µl of whole blood was incubated with 1 μg/ml Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide for 1 hr at 37 °C to determine the stimulated plasma elastase concentration. Gastrointestinal symptoms and feeding tolerance markers were measured preexercise, every 15 min during exercise, and hourly postexercise for 3 hr. The postexercise leukocyte (mean [95% confidence interval]: 12.7 [11.6, 14.0] × 109/L [main effect of time, MEOT]; p < .001) and neutrophil (10.2 [9.1, 11.5] × 109/L; p < .001) counts, as well as the plasma intestinal fatty acid binding protein (470 pg/ml; +120%; p = .012) and cortisol (236 nMol/L; +71%; p = .006) concentrations, were similar throughout recovery for both trials. No significant difference in breath H2 and gastrointestinal symptoms was observed between trials. The total (Trial × Time, p = .025) and per cell (Trial × Time, p = .001) bacterially stimulated neutrophil elastase release was greater for the chocolate-flavored dairy milk recovery beverage (+360% and +28%, respectively) in recovery, compared with the water trial (+85% and -38%, respectively). Chocolate-flavored dairy milk recovery beverage consumption immediately after exercise prevents the decrease in neutrophil function during the recovery period, and it does not account for substantial malabsorption or gastrointestinal symptoms over a water volume equivalent.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.