Meta-analysis2020Open access

Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Females Taking Oral Creatine Monohydrate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

de Guingand DL, Palmer KR, Snow RJ, Davies-Tuck ML, Ellery SJ

Nutrients · 24 citations

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
University or hospital
Monash University
Government
State Government of Victoria
University or hospital
Hudson Institute of Medical Research
Government
National Health and Medical Research Council

Based on 4 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2020-06-15 · Nutrients · vol. 12 · issue 6 · p. 1780
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Cited
36 citations · more than 57% of similar papers · 0.6× the field average
References
196 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment · Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Keywords
Adverse effect, Medicine, Creatine, Meta-analysis, Internal medicine, Relative risk, Confidence interval
MeSH
humans, gastrointestinal diseases, liver diseases, weight gain, creatine, risk assessment, body composition, dietary supplements, adult, aged, middle aged, female, young adult

5 authors

From AU

  • Deborah L. de Guingand · correspondingHudson Institute of Medical Research
  • Kirsten Rebecca PalmerMonash Medical Centre; Monash Health; Monash University
  • Rodney J. SnowDeakin University
  • Miranda L. Davies-TuckHudson Institute of Medical Research
  • Stacey J. ElleryHudson Institute of Medical Research; Monash University

Abstract

Creatine Monohydrate (CrM) is a dietary supplement routinely used as an ergogenic aid for sport and training, and as a potential therapeutic aid to augment different disease processes. Despite its increased use in recent years, studies reporting potential adverse outcomes of CrM have been mostly derived from male or mixed sex populations. A systematic search was conducted, which included female participants on CrM, where adverse outcomes were reported, with meta-analysis performed where appropriate. Six hundred and fifty-six studies were identified where creatine supplementation was the primary intervention; fifty-eight were female only studies (9%). Twenty-nine studies monitored for adverse outcomes, with 951 participants. There were no deaths or serious adverse outcomes reported. There were no significant differences in total adverse events, (risk ratio (RR) 1.24 (95% CI 0.51, 2.98)), gastrointestinal events, (RR 1.09 (95% CI 0.53, 2.24)), or weight gain, (mean difference (MD) 1.24 kg pre-intervention, (95% CI -0.34, 2.82)) to 1.37 kg post-intervention (95% CI -0.50, 3.23)), in CrM supplemented females, when stratified by dosing regimen and subject to meta-analysis. No statistically significant difference was reported in measures of renal or hepatic function. In conclusion, mortality and serious adverse events are not associated with CrM supplementation in females. Nor does the use of creatine supplementation increase the risk of total adverse outcomes, weight gain or renal and hepatic complications in females. However, all future studies of creatine supplementation in females should consider surveillance and comprehensive reporting of adverse outcomes to better inform participants and health professionals involved in future trials.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.