Study2020Open access

Two weeks of early time-restricted feeding (eTRF) improves skeletal muscle insulin and anabolic sensitivity in healthy men

Jones R, Pabla P, Mallinson J, Nixon A, Taylor T, Bennett A, Tsintzas K

The American journal of clinical nutrition · 100 citations

How it was studied

Design
Controlled clinical trial (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
Directorate for Biological Sciences
Government
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

Based on 2 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2020-07-01 · Am J Clin Nutr · vol. 112 · issue 4 · pp. 1015–1028
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Cited
119 citations · more than 98% of similar papers · 6.6× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
46 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Dietary Effects on Health · Circadian rhythm and melatonin · Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Keywords
Anabolism, Insulin sensitivity, Skeletal muscle, Endocrinology, Internal medicine, Medicine, Insulin, Insulin resistance
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, humans, insulin resistance, glucose, amino acids, branched-chain, fasting, body composition, energy metabolism, energy intake, adult, male

7 authors

From GB

  • Robert JonesUniversity of Nottingham; Arthritis UK
  • Pardeep PablaUniversity of Nottingham; Arthritis UK
  • Joanne E. MallinsonUniversity of Nottingham; Arthritis UK
  • Aline NixonUniversity of Nottingham; Arthritis UK
  • Tariq TaylorUniversity of Nottingham; Arthritis UK
  • Andrew J. BennettUniversity of Nottingham

Abstract

Background

Altering the temporal distribution of energy intake (EI) and introducing periods of intermittent fasting (IF) exert important metabolic effects. Restricting EI to earlier in the day [early time-restricted feeding (eTRF)] is a novel type of IF.

Objectives

We assessed the chronic effects of eTRF compared with an energy-matched control on whole-body and skeletal muscle insulin and anabolic sensitivity.

Methods

Sixteen healthy males (aged 23 ± 1 y; BMI 24.0 ± 0.6 kg·m-2) were assigned to 2 groups that underwent either 2 wk of eTRF (n = 8) or control/caloric restriction (CON:CR; n = 8) diet. The eTRF diet was consumed ad libitum and the intervention was conducted before the CON:CR, in which the diet was provided to match the reduction in EI and body weight observed in eTRF. During eTRF, daily EI was restricted to between 08:00 and 16:00, which prolonged the overnight fast by ∼5 h. The metabolic responses to a carbohydrate/protein drink were assessed pre- and post-interventions following a 12-h overnight fast.

Results

When compared with CON:CR, eTRF improved whole-body insulin sensitivity [between-group difference (95% CI): 1.89 (0.18, 3.60); P = 0.03; η2p = 0.29] and skeletal muscle uptake of glucose [between-group difference (95% CI): 4266 (261, 8270) μmol·min-1·kg-1·180 min; P = 0.04; η2p = 0.31] and branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) [between-group difference (95% CI): 266 (77, 455) nmol·min-1·kg-1·180 min; P = 0.01; η2p = 0.44]. eTRF caused a reduction in EI (∼400 kcal·d-1) and weight loss (-1.04 ± 0.25 kg; P = 0.01) that was matched in CON:CR (-1.24 ± 0.35 kg; P = 0.01).

Conclusions

Under free-living conditions, eTRF improves whole-body insulin sensitivity and increases skeletal muscle glucose and BCAA uptake. The metabolic benefits of eTRF are independent of its effects on weight loss and represent chronic adaptations rather than the effect of the last bout of overnight fast. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03969745.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.