Social Media Use and Mental Health and Well-Being Among Adolescents - A Scoping Review
Schønning V, Hjetland GJ, Aarø LE, Skogen JC
Frontiers in psychology · 124 citations
How it was studied
- Design
- Systematic review (classified by our AI screen)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Health markers and function
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Independent funding
- Government
- Helsedirektoratet
Based on 1 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.
Publication
- Published
- 2020-08-14 · Front Psychol · vol. 11 · p. 1949
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media
- Cited
- 297 citations · more than 100% of similar papers · 43.5× the field average
- Impact
- Top 10% most cited in its field
- References
- 120 works
- Access
- Open access (journal) · CC-BY
- Research areas
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Child Development and Digital Technology · Educational Methods and Impacts
- Keywords
- social media use, adolescent mental health, well-being, depression, Facebook, social network sites, adolescents, social media engagement
4 authors
From NO
- Viktor Schønning · correspondingNorwegian Institute of Public Health
- Gunnhild Johnsen HjetlandNorwegian Institute of Public Health
- Leif Edvard AarøNorwegian Institute of Public Health
- Jens Christoffer SkogenNorwegian Institute of Public Health; Stavanger University Hospital; University of Stavanger
Abstract
Introduction: Social media has become an integrated part of daily life, with an estimated 3 billion social media users worldwide. Adolescents and young adults are the most active users of social media. Research on social media has grown rapidly, with the potential association of social media use and mental health and well-being becoming a polarized and much-studied subject. The current body of knowledge on this theme is complex and difficult-to-follow. The current paper presents a scoping review of the published literature in the research field of social media use and its association with mental health and well-being among adolescents. Methods and Analysis: First, relevant databases were searched for eligible studies with a vast range of relevant search terms for social media use and mental health and well-being over the past five years. Identified studies were screened thoroughly and included or excluded based on prior established criteria. Data from the included studies were extracted and summarized according to the previously published study protocol. Results: Among the 79 studies that met our inclusion criteria, the vast majority (94%) were quantitative, with a cross-sectional design (57%) being the most common study design. Several studies focused on different aspects of mental health, with depression (29%) being the most studied aspect. Almost half of the included studies focused on use of non-specified social network sites (43%). Of specified social media, Facebook (39%) was the most studied social network site. The most used approach to measuring social media use was frequency and duration (56%). Participants of both genders were included in most studies (92%) but seldom examined as an explanatory variable. 77% of the included studies had social media use as the independent variable. Conclusion: The findings from the current scoping review revealed that about 3/4 of the included studies focused on social media and some aspect of pathology. Focus on the potential association between social media use and positive outcomes seems to be rarer in the current literature. Amongst the included studies, few separated between different forms of (inter)actions on social media, which are likely to be differentially associated with mental health and well-being outcomes.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.