Whole body passive heating versus dynamic lower body exercise: a comparison of peripheral hemodynamic profiles
Amin SB, Hansen AB, Mugele H, Willmer F, Gross F, Reimeir B, Cornwell WK, Simpson LL, Moore JP, Romero SA, Lawley JS
Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 27 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Controlled clinical trial (classified by our AI screen)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Mechanisms only
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Independent funding
- University or hospital
- Univt of Innsbruck
Based on 1 listed funder(s).
Publication
- Published
- 2020-10-22 · J Appl Physiol (1985) · vol. 130 · issue 1 · pp. 160–171
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Cited
- 30 citations · more than 84% of similar papers · 1.4× the field average
- References
- 39 works
- Access
- Open access (repository copy) · OTHER-OA
- Research areas
- Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control · Thermoregulation and physiological responses · Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Keywords
- Hemodynamics, Blood flow, Medicine, Heart rate, Cardiology, Femoral artery, Intensity (physics), Cardiac output, Internal medicine, Shear rate, Blood pressure, Materials science
- MeSH
- femoral artery, humans, exercise, heating, heart rate, regional blood flow, adult, female, male, hemodynamics, young adult
11 authors
From AT, US, GB
- Sachin B. AminUniversität Innsbruck
- Alexander B. HansenUniversität Innsbruck
- Hendrik MugeleUniversität Innsbruck
- Felix WillmerUniversität Innsbruck
- Florian GrossUniversität Innsbruck
- Benjamin ReimeirUniversität Innsbruck
Abstract
Passive heating has emerged as a therapeutic intervention for the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease. Like exercise, heating increases peripheral artery blood flow and shear rate, which is thought to be a primary mechanism underpinning endothelium-mediated vascular adaptation. However, few studies have compared the increase in arterial blood flow and shear rate between dynamic exercise and passive heating. In a fixed crossover design study, 15 moderately trained healthy participants (25.6 ± 3.4 yr) (5 female) underwent 30 min of whole body passive heating (42°C bath), followed on a separate day by 30 min of semi-recumbent stepping exercise performed at two workloads corresponding to the increase in cardiac output (Qc) (Δ3.72 L·min-1) and heart rate (HR) (Δ40 beats/min) recorded at the end of passive heating. At the same Qc (Δ3.72 L·min-1 vs. 3.78 L·min-1), femoral artery blood flow (1,599 mL/min vs. 1,947 mL/min) (P = 0.596) and shear rate (162 s-1 vs. 192 s-1) (P = 0.471) measured by ultrasonography were similar between passive heating and stepping exercise. However, for the same HRMATCHED intensity, femoral blood flow (1,599 mL·min-1 vs. 2,588 mL·min-1) and shear rate (161 s-1 vs. 271 s-1) were significantly greater during exercise, compared with heating (both P = 2max); however, exercise performed at a higher intensity (53% V̇o2max) results in significantly larger shear rates toward the active skeletal muscle.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Passive heating and exercise increase blood flow through arteries, generating a frictional force, termed shear rate, which is associated with positive vascular health. Few studies have compared the increase in arterial blood flow and shear rate elicited by passive heating with that elicited by dynamic continuous exercise. We found that 30 min of whole body passive hot-water immersion (42°C bath) increased femoral artery blood flow and shear rate equivalent to exercising at a moderate intensity (∼57% HRmax).
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.