Study2021

Whole body passive heating versus dynamic lower body exercise: a comparison of peripheral hemodynamic profiles

Amin SB, Hansen AB, Mugele H, Willmer F, Gross F, Reimeir B, Cornwell WK, Simpson LL, Moore JP, Romero SA, Lawley JS

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 27 citations

Review labels

Mechanisms only

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Controlled clinical trial (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Mechanisms only

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
University or hospital
Univt of Innsbruck

Based on 1 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2020-10-22 · J Appl Physiol (1985) · vol. 130 · issue 1 · pp. 160–171
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Cited
30 citations · more than 84% of similar papers · 1.4× the field average
References
39 works
Access
Open access (repository copy) · OTHER-OA
Research areas
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control · Thermoregulation and physiological responses · Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
Hemodynamics, Blood flow, Medicine, Heart rate, Cardiology, Femoral artery, Intensity (physics), Cardiac output, Internal medicine, Shear rate, Blood pressure, Materials science
MeSH
femoral artery, humans, exercise, heating, heart rate, regional blood flow, adult, female, male, hemodynamics, young adult

11 authors

From AT, US, GB

  • Sachin B. AminUniversität Innsbruck
  • Alexander B. HansenUniversität Innsbruck
  • Hendrik MugeleUniversität Innsbruck
  • Felix WillmerUniversität Innsbruck
  • Florian GrossUniversität Innsbruck
  • Benjamin ReimeirUniversität Innsbruck

Abstract

Passive heating has emerged as a therapeutic intervention for the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease. Like exercise, heating increases peripheral artery blood flow and shear rate, which is thought to be a primary mechanism underpinning endothelium-mediated vascular adaptation. However, few studies have compared the increase in arterial blood flow and shear rate between dynamic exercise and passive heating. In a fixed crossover design study, 15 moderately trained healthy participants (25.6 ± 3.4 yr) (5 female) underwent 30 min of whole body passive heating (42°C bath), followed on a separate day by 30 min of semi-recumbent stepping exercise performed at two workloads corresponding to the increase in cardiac output (Qc) (Δ3.72 L·min-1) and heart rate (HR) (Δ40 beats/min) recorded at the end of passive heating. At the same Qc (Δ3.72 L·min-1 vs. 3.78 L·min-1), femoral artery blood flow (1,599 mL/min vs. 1,947 mL/min) (P = 0.596) and shear rate (162 s-1 vs. 192 s-1) (P = 0.471) measured by ultrasonography were similar between passive heating and stepping exercise. However, for the same HRMATCHED intensity, femoral blood flow (1,599 mL·min-1 vs. 2,588 mL·min-1) and shear rate (161 s-1 vs. 271 s-1) were significantly greater during exercise, compared with heating (both P = 2max); however, exercise performed at a higher intensity (53% V̇o2max) results in significantly larger shear rates toward the active skeletal muscle.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Passive heating and exercise increase blood flow through arteries, generating a frictional force, termed shear rate, which is associated with positive vascular health. Few studies have compared the increase in arterial blood flow and shear rate elicited by passive heating with that elicited by dynamic continuous exercise. We found that 30 min of whole body passive hot-water immersion (42°C bath) increased femoral artery blood flow and shear rate equivalent to exercising at a moderate intensity (∼57% HRmax).

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.