Cross-sectional study2021

The association of red meat consumption and mental health in women: A cross-sectional study

Darooghegi Mofrad M, Mozaffari H, Sheikhi A, Zamani B, Azadbakht L

Complementary therapies in medicine · 16 citations

Review labels

Food frequency questionnaireNo stated lifestyle adjustment

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Cross-sectional study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Food frequency questionnaire

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
University or hospital
Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services

Based on 1 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2020-10-08 · Complement Ther Med · vol. 56 · p. 102588
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Cited
33 citations · more than 93% of similar papers · 3.4× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
36 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY-NC-ND
Research areas
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
Medicine, Red meat, Anxiety, Cross-sectional study, Confounding, Depression (economics), Mental distress, Quartile, Mental health, Logistic regression, Environmental health, Internal medicine, Confidence interval, Psychiatry
MeSH
humans, diet, cross-sectional studies, depression, stress, psychological, anxiety, mental health, adult, iran, female, young adult, surveys and questionnaires, red meat

5 authors

From IR, CA

  • Manije Darooghegi MofradTehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Hadis MozaffariUniversity of British Columbia
  • Ali SheikhiTehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Behzad ZamaniTehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Leila Azadbakht · correspondingIsfahan University of Medical Sciences; University of Isfahan; Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Objectives

Previous studies have shown that red meat consumption has beneficial effects on health. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between red meat consumption and depression, anxiety and psychological distress in Tehrani women.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 482 women aged 20-50 years old referred to the health centers of Tehran University of Medical Sciences in 2018 were selected by multistage cluster sampling. The usual dietary intake was evaluated using a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire containing 168 items that its validity and reliability were approved previously. The red meat category was defined as the sum of red meats (beef, lamb), and organ meats (beef liver, kidney, and heart, ruminant meat). Psychological disorders were assessed using a validated Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scales (DASS) questionnaires with 21-items. In the logistic regression analysis, the results were adjusted to the confounding factors.

Results

The mean age of the study participants was 31.87 ± 7.6 years. The prevalence of depressive symptoms, anxiety and psychological distress among participants was 34%, 40% and 42%, respectively. After controlling for potential confounders, women in the highest quartile of red meat had a highest prevalence of depressive symptoms (OR: 2.51; 95% CI: 1.32-4.76; p = 0.002), anxiety (OR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.00-3.29; p = 0.034) and stress (OR: 3.47; 95% CI: 1.88-6.42; p < 0.001) compared with those in the lowest quartile.

Conclusions

We found a significant association between red meat intake and mental health in women. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY-NC-ND).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.