Randomized controlled trial2022

Effects of artificial CO2-rich cold-water immersion on repeated-cycling work efficiency

Yoshimura M, Hojo T, Yamamoto H, Tachibana M, Nakamura M, Fukuoka Y

Research in sports medicine (Print) · 7 citations

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) Regional Industry-Academia Value Program

Based on 1 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2020-12-10 · Res Sports Med · vol. 30 · issue 2 · pp. 215–227
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Cited
7 citations · more than 71% of similar papers · 0.9× the field average
References
41 works
Access
Paywalled
Research areas
Sports Performance and Training · Cardiovascular and exercise physiology · Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
Cycling, Anaerobic exercise, Wingate test, Heart rate, Immersion (mathematics), Blood lactate, Aerobic exercise, Medicine, Animal science, Physical therapy, Internal medicine, Blood pressure, Biology, Mathematics
MeSH
humans, carbon dioxide, water, immersion, recovery of function, athletic performance, cold temperature

6 authors

From JP

  • Miho YoshimuraDoshisha University
  • Tatsuya HojoDoshisha University
  • H YamamotoDoshisha University
  • Misato TachibanaDoshisha University
  • Masatoshi NakamuraNiigata University
  • Yoshiyuki Fukuoka · correspondingDoshisha University

Abstract

We investigated the acute effects of cold-water immersion (20°C) with higher CO2 concentration (CCWI) following a high-intensity Wingate anaerobic exercise test (WAnT) on subjects' sublingual temperature (Tsub), blood lactate ([La]b), heart rate (HR), and aerobic cycling work efficiency (WE) compared to cold tap-water immersion (20°C; CWI) and passive recovery (PAS). Fifteen subjects completed three testing sessions at 1-week intervals. Each trial consisted of a first WE and WAnT, and a 20-min recovery intervention (randomized: CCWI, CWI, and PAS) before repeating a second WE and WAnT. The WE was measured by the metabolic demand during 50% V.O2max exercise. HR, Tsub, and [La]b were recorded throughout the testing sessions. There was a significant decline in the WE from 1st bout to 2nd bout at each recovery intervention. The WAnT was also significantly reduced at 2nd bout. Significantly reduced [La]b was achieved at CCWI compared to PAS, but not to the CWI. Likewise, the reduction in HR following immersion was the largest at CCWI compared to the other conditions. These findings indicate that CCWI is an effective intervention for maintaining repeated cycling work efficiency, which might be associated with reduced [La]b and HR.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.