Study2021Open access

Collective music listening: Movement energy is enhanced by groove and visual social cues

Dotov D, Bosnyak D, Trainor LJ

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 32 citations

How it was studied

Design
Controlled clinical trial (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
No health outcome

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Nonprofit
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
Government
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Government
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Government
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Government
canadian institutes of health research
Nonprofit
canadian institute for advanced research
Government
social sciences and humanities research council of canada

Based on 7 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2021-01-15 · Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) · vol. 74 · issue 6 · pp. 1037–1053
Publisher
SAGE Publishing
Cited
112 citations · more than 99% of similar papers · 9.9× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
115 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY-NC
Research areas
Neuroscience and Music Perception · Music Technology and Sound Studies · Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
Active listening, Psychology, Stimulus (psychology), Cognitive psychology, Beat (acoustics), Communication, Movement (music), Musical, Visual arts, Acoustics, Aesthetics, Art, Physics
MeSH
humans, cues, auditory perception, movement, music, recognition, psychology

3 authors

From CA

  • Dobromir G. Dotov · correspondingMcMaster University
  • Daniel J. BosnyakMcMaster University
  • Laurel J. TrainorBaycrest Hospital; Rotman Research Institute; McMaster University

Abstract

The regularity of musical beat makes it a powerful stimulus promoting movement synchrony among people. Synchrony can increase interpersonal trust, affiliation, and cooperation. Musical pieces can be classified according to the quality of groove; the higher the groove, the more it induces the desire to move. We investigated questions related to collective music-listening among 33 participants in an experiment conducted in a naturalistic yet acoustically controlled setting of a research concert hall with motion tracking. First, does higher groove music induce (1) movement with more energy and (2) higher interpersonal movement coordination? Second, does visual social information manipulated by having eyes open or eyes closed also affect energy and coordination? Participants listened to pieces from four categories formed by crossing groove (high, low) with tempo (higher, lower). Their upper body movement was recorded via head markers. Self-reported ratings of grooviness, emotional valence, emotional intensity, and familiarity were collected after each song. A biomechanically motivated measure of movement energy increased with high-groove songs and was positively correlated with grooviness ratings, confirming the theoretically implied but less tested motor response to groove. Participants' ratings of emotional valence and emotional intensity correlated positively with movement energy, suggesting that movement energy relates to emotional engagement with music. Movement energy was higher in eyes-open trials, suggesting that seeing each other enhanced participants' responses, consistent with social facilitation or contagion. Furthermore, interpersonal coordination was higher both for the high-groove and eyes-open conditions, indicating that the social situation of collective music listening affects how music is experienced.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY-NC).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.