Meta-analysis2021Industry fundedOpen access

Funded in part by General Mills

Effects of Whole Grain Intake, Compared with Refined Grain, on Appetite and Energy Intake: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Sanders LM, Zhu Y, Wilcox ML, Koecher K, Maki KC

Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 39 citations

Review labels

Author industry tiesControlled feedingIndustry funded

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Food provided by researchers

Who paid for it

Funding
Industry funded
Company
General Mills
Unclassified
Bell Institute of Nutrition
Authors
At least one author declares a financial tie to industry

Based on 2 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2020-12-20 · Adv Nutr · vol. 12 · issue 4 · pp. 1177–1195
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Cited
54 citations · more than 73% of similar papers · 1.0× the field average
References
71 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY-NC
Research areas
Diet and metabolism studies · Food composition and properties · Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
Meta-analysis, Appetite, Medicine, Whole grains, Internal medicine, Food science, Chemistry
MeSH
humans, hunger, appetite, satiation, energy intake, adult, edible grain, whole grains

5 authors

From US

  • Lisa Sanders
  • Yong ZhuGeneral Mills (United States)
  • Meredith Leigh Wilcox
  • Katie J. KoecherGeneral Mills (United States)
  • Kevin Carl Maki · correspondingIndiana University Bloomington

Abstract

Results from observational studies indicate that whole grain (WG) intake is inversely associated with BMI and risk of weight gain. WG intake may influence energy balance and body composition through effects on appetite and energy intake. To evaluate the impact of WG food consumption on appetite and energy intake, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed of results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing WG food consumption, appetite, and energy intake in adults. A search of PubMed, Scopus, and Food Science and Technology Abstracts yielded 36 RCTs measuring subjective appetite ratings after consuming WG foods compared with refined grain (RG) controls. Thirty-two of these studies reported AUCs for subjective appetite (hunger, fullness, satiety, desire to eat, or prospective consumption) and/or energy intake and were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled estimates from meta-analyses are expressed as standardized mean differences (SMDs). Compared with RG foods, intake of WG foods resulted in significant differences in AUCs for subjective hunger (SMD: -0.34; 95% CI: -0.46, -0.22; P < 0.001), fullness (SMD: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.66; P < 0.001), satiety (SMD: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.47; P < 0.001), and desire to eat (SMD: -0.33; 95% CI: -0.46, -0.20; P < 0.001). There were small, nonsignificant reductions in prospective consumption ratings (P = 0.08) and energy intake (P = 0.07) with WG intake compared with RG. These results support the view that consumption of WG foods, compared with RG foods, significantly impacts subjective appetite, and might partly explain the inverse associations between WG food intake and risk of overweight, obesity, and weight gain over time. PROSPERO registration: CRD42020148217.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY-NC).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.