Funded in part by General Mills
Effects of Whole Grain Intake, Compared with Refined Grain, on Appetite and Energy Intake: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Sanders LM, Zhu Y, Wilcox ML, Koecher K, Maki KC
Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 39 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Health markers and function
- Intake measured by
- Food provided by researchers
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Industry funded
- Company
- General Mills
- Unclassified
- Bell Institute of Nutrition
- Authors
- At least one author declares a financial tie to industry
Based on 2 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.
Publication
- Published
- 2020-12-20 · Adv Nutr · vol. 12 · issue 4 · pp. 1177–1195
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Cited
- 54 citations · more than 73% of similar papers · 1.0× the field average
- References
- 71 works
- Access
- Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY-NC
- Research areas
- Diet and metabolism studies · Food composition and properties · Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Keywords
- Meta-analysis, Appetite, Medicine, Whole grains, Internal medicine, Food science, Chemistry
- MeSH
- humans, hunger, appetite, satiation, energy intake, adult, edible grain, whole grains
5 authors
From US
- Lisa Sanders
- Yong ZhuGeneral Mills (United States)
- Meredith Leigh Wilcox
- Katie J. KoecherGeneral Mills (United States)
- Kevin Carl Maki · correspondingIndiana University Bloomington
Abstract
Results from observational studies indicate that whole grain (WG) intake is inversely associated with BMI and risk of weight gain. WG intake may influence energy balance and body composition through effects on appetite and energy intake. To evaluate the impact of WG food consumption on appetite and energy intake, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed of results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing WG food consumption, appetite, and energy intake in adults. A search of PubMed, Scopus, and Food Science and Technology Abstracts yielded 36 RCTs measuring subjective appetite ratings after consuming WG foods compared with refined grain (RG) controls. Thirty-two of these studies reported AUCs for subjective appetite (hunger, fullness, satiety, desire to eat, or prospective consumption) and/or energy intake and were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled estimates from meta-analyses are expressed as standardized mean differences (SMDs). Compared with RG foods, intake of WG foods resulted in significant differences in AUCs for subjective hunger (SMD: -0.34; 95% CI: -0.46, -0.22; P < 0.001), fullness (SMD: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.66; P < 0.001), satiety (SMD: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.47; P < 0.001), and desire to eat (SMD: -0.33; 95% CI: -0.46, -0.20; P < 0.001). There were small, nonsignificant reductions in prospective consumption ratings (P = 0.08) and energy intake (P = 0.07) with WG intake compared with RG. These results support the view that consumption of WG foods, compared with RG foods, significantly impacts subjective appetite, and might partly explain the inverse associations between WG food intake and risk of overweight, obesity, and weight gain over time. PROSPERO registration: CRD42020148217.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY-NC).
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.