Cross-sectional study2021

Magnesium intake, insulin resistance and markers of endothelial function among women

Bavani NG, Saneei P, Hassanzadeh Keshteli A, Yazdannik A, Falahi E, Sadeghi O, Esmaillzadeh A

Public health nutrition · 10 citations

How it was studied

Design
Cross-sectional study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
University or hospital
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
University or hospital
Lorestan University of Medical Sciences
University or hospital
Food Security Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Based on 3 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2021-03-15 · Public Health Nutr · vol. 24 · issue 17 · pp. 5777–5785
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Cited
14 citations · more than 72% of similar papers · 1.0× the field average
References
49 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Magnesium in Health and Disease · Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments · Potassium and Related Disorders
Keywords
Insulin resistance, Insulin sensitivity, Magnesium, Function (biology), Insulin, Linkage (software)
MeSH
humans, insulin resistance, magnesium, insulin, blood glucose, cross-sectional studies, iran, female, biomarkers

7 authors

From IR, CA

  • Narges Ghorbani BavaniIsfahan University of Medical Sciences
  • Parvane SaneeiIsfahan University of Medical Sciences
  • Ammar Hassanzadeh KeshteliUniversity of Alberta
  • Ahmadreza YazdannikIsfahan University of Medical Sciences; Iranshahr University
  • Ebrahim FalahiLorestan University of Medical Sciences
  • Omid SadeghiTehran University of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Objective

We investigated the association of dietary Mg intake with insulin resistance and markers of endothelial function among Iranian women.

Design

A cross-sectional study.

Setting

Usual dietary intakes were assessed using a validated FFQ. Dietary Mg intake was calculated by summing up the amount of Mg in all foods. A fasting blood sample was taken to measure serum concentrations of glycemic indices (fasting plasma glucose and insulin) and endothelial function markers (E-selectin, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1). Insulin resistance and sensitivity were estimated using the Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), Homeostasis Model Assessment β-cell function (HOMA-β) and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI).

Participants

Iranian female nurses (n 345) selected by a multistage cluster random sampling method.

Results

The Mg intake across energy-adjusted quartiles was 205 (se 7), 221·4 (se 8), 254·3 (se 7) and 355·2 (se 9) mg/d, respectively. After adjustments for potential confounders, QUICKI level was significantly different across quartiles of Mg intake (Q1: 0·34 (se 0·02), Q2: 0·36 (se 0·01), Q3: 0·40 (se 0·01), and Q4: 0·39 (se 0·02), P = 0·02); however, this association disappeared after considering markers of endothelial function, indicating that this relation might be mediated through endothelial dysfunction. After controlling for all potential confounders, Mg intake was inversely, but not significantly, associated with serum concentrations of sICAM (Q1: 239 (se 17), Q2: 214 (se 12), Q3: 196 (se 12), and Q4: 195 (se 17), P = 0·29). There was no other significant association between dietary Mg intake and other indicators of glucose homoeostasis or endothelial markers.

Conclusions

Higher dietary Mg intake was associated with better insulin sensitivity in Iranian females. This linkage was mediated through reduced endothelial dysfunction.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.