Meta-analysis2021

Effect of music therapy on improving sleep quality in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Chen CT, Tung HH, Fang CJ, Wang JL, Ko NY, Chang YJ, Chen YC

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 48 citations

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
University or hospital
National Cheng Kung University Hospital
Grants
National Cheng Kung University Hospital (NCKUH-10909037); National Cheng Kung University Hospital (NCKUH‐T10905020)

Based on 1 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2021-04-20 · J Am Geriatr Soc · vol. 69 · issue 7 · pp. 1925–1932
Publisher
Wiley
Cited
92 citations · more than 86% of similar papers · 2.1× the field average
References
32 works
Access
Paywalled
Research areas
Music Therapy and Health · Sleep and related disorders · Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Keywords
Medicine, Cochrane Library, Randomized controlled trial, Music therapy, Meta-analysis, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, MEDLINE, Subgroup analysis, Physical therapy, Systematic review, Gerontology, Cognition, Psychiatry, Internal medicine, Sleep quality
MeSH
humans, sleep initiation and maintenance disorders, treatment outcome, music therapy, sleep, quality of life, music, aged, aged, 80 and over, female, male, randomized controlled trials as topic

7 authors

From TW

  • Chia‐Te ChenNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University; National Cheng Kung University Hospital
  • Heng‐Hsin TungNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
  • Ching‐Ju FangNational Cheng Kung University Hospital; National Cheng Kung University
  • Jiun‐Ling WangNational Cheng Kung University Hospital
  • Nai‐Ying KoNational Cheng Kung University Hospital; National Cheng Kung University
  • Ying‐Ju ChangNational Cheng Kung University Hospital; National Cheng Kung University

Abstract

Objectives

Poor sleep quality is a common issue among older adults; it can lead to a poor quality of life and impairments in cognitive function and physical health. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of listening to music on sleep quality in older adults.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analyses.

Setting

Five databases, including Embase, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and the Index to Taiwan Periodical Literature System, were searched to identify studies assessing the efficacy of music therapy in older adults aged 60 years and older published through February 20, 2021.

Participants

Adults aged 60 years and older.

Measurements

We searched English- and Chinese-language studies of randomized control trials. All studies were reviewed by two independent investigators. The primary sleep outcome was the Pittsburgh sleep quality index. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and Review Manager 5.3 software was used to conduct the meta-analysis.

Results

Five randomized control trials were included in the meta-analysis. Older adults who listened to music experienced significantly better sleep quality than those who did not listen to music [mean difference (MD): -1.96, 95% CI -2.23 to -1.73, P = 0.003]. The subgroup analysis revealed that older adults who listened to sedative music obtained a more effective improvement in sleep quality than those who listened to rhythm-centered music (MD: -2.35, 95% CI -3.59 to -1.10, P = 0.0002). Furthermore, listening to music for longer than 4 weeks (MD: -2.61, 95% CI -4.72 to -0.50, P = 0.02) was to be effective at improving sleep quality.

Conclusions

Music therapy is safe and easy to administer and can effectively improve sleep quality among older adults, particularly those listening to more sedative music for at least a four-week duration.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.