Study2021Open access

Dietary and Lifestyle Factors Related to Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review

Zhang M, Hou ZK, Huang ZB, Chen XL, Liu FB

Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 96 citations

How it was studied

Design
Systematic review (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Government
Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province
Grants
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81774450)

Based on 2 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2021-04-01 · Ther Clin Risk Manag · vol. Volume 17 · pp. 305–323
Publisher
Dove Medical Press
Cited
170 citations · more than 98% of similar papers · 5.8× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
95 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY-NC
Research areas
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments · Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies · Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Keywords
Medicine, Reflux, Disease, GERD, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Intensive care medicine

5 authors

From CN

  • Mei ZhangGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine
  • Zhengkun Hou · correspondingFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine
  • Zhi-Bang HuangGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine
  • Xinlin ChenGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine
  • Fengbin LiuFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine

Abstract

We performed this review to clarify which dietary and lifestyle factors are related to gastroesophageal reflux disease. Through a systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Chinese BioMedical Literature (CBM) databases, we identified articles with clear definitions of GERD, including nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD), reflux esophagitis (RE) and Barrett's esophagus (BE), that included dietary and lifestyle factors as independent factors affecting the onset of GERD (expressed as odds ratios (ORs) or relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)). Due to heterogeneity among the studies, we used descriptive statistical analyses to analyze and synthesize each outcome based on the disease type. In total, 72 articles were included, conducted in ten Western countries (26 articles in total) and nine Eastern countries (46 articles in total). We categorized dietary factors into 20 items and lifestyle factors into 11 items. GERD is related to many irregular dietary and lifestyle habits (such as a habit of midnight snacking: OR=5.08, 95% CI 4.03-6.4; skipping breakfast: OR=2.7, 95% CI 2.17-3.35; eating quickly: OR=4.06, 95% CI 3.11-5.29; eating very hot foods: OR=1.81, 95% CI 1.37-2.4; and eating beyond fullness: OR=2.85, 95% CI 2.18-3.73). Vegetarian diets (consumption of nonvegetarian food (no/yes); OR=0.34, 95% CI 0.211-0.545) and no intake of meat (OR=0.841, 95% CI 0.715-0.990) were negatively related to GERD, while meat (daily meat, fish, and egg intake: OR=1.088, 95% CI 1.042-1.135) and fat (high-fat diet: OR=7.568, 95% CI 4.557-8.908) consumption were positively related to GERD. An interval of less than three hours between dinner and bedtime (OR=7.45, 95% CI 3.38-16.4) was positively related to GERD, and proper physical exercise (physical exercise >30 minutes (>3 times/week): OR=0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.9) was negatively correlated with GERD. Smoking (OR=1.19, 95% CI 1.12-1.264), alcohol consumption (OR=1.278, 95% CI 1.207-1.353) and mental state (poor mental state: OR=1.278, 95% CI 1.207-1.353) were positively correlated with GERD. RE (vitamin C: OR=0.46, 95% CI=0.24-0.90) and BE (vitamin C: OR=0.44,95% CI 0.2-0.98; vitamin E: OR=0.46, 95% CI 0.26-0.83) were generally negatively correlated with antioxidant intake. In conclusion, many dietary and lifestyle factors affect the onset of GERD, and these factors differ among regions and disease types. These findings need to be further confirmed in subsequent studies.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY-NC).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.