Cross-sectional study2021Industry fundedOpen access

Funded in part by Medtronic Foundation

Unhealthy Food and Psychological Stress: The Association between Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Perceived Stress in Working-Class Young Adults

Lopes Cortes M, Andrade Louzado J, Galvão Oliveira M, Moraes Bezerra V, Mistro S, Souto Medeiros D, Arruda Soares D, Oliveira Silva K, Nicolaevna Kochergin C, Honorato Dos Santos de Carvalho VC, Wildes Amorim W, Serrate Mengue S

International journal of environmental research and public health · 59 citations

Review labels

Industry fundedNo stated lifestyle adjustment

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Cross-sectional study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Industry funded
University or hospital
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation
Company
Medtronic Foundation
Grants
Medtronic Foundation (47535)

Based on 2 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2021-04-07 · Int J Environ Res Public Health · vol. 18 · issue 8 · p. 3863
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Cited
83 citations · more than 98% of similar papers · 7.0× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
36 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior · Culinary Culture and Tourism
Keywords
Environmental health, Consumption (sociology), Perceived Stress Scale, Odds, Medicine, Stress (linguistics), Cross-sectional study, Ordered logit, Food science, Logistic regression
MeSH
humans, diet, cross-sectional studies, stress, psychological, food handling, brazil, young adult, fast foods

12 authors

From BR

  • Matheus Lopes Cortes · correspondingUniversidade Federal da Bahia
  • José Andrade LouzadoUniversidade Federal da Bahia
  • Márcio Galvão OliveiraUniversidade Federal da Bahia
  • Vanessa Moraes BezerraUniversidade Federal da Bahia
  • Sóstenes MistroUniversidade Federal da Bahia
  • Danielle Souto de MedeirosUniversidade Federal da Bahia

Abstract

Background

Ultra-processed foods are industrial formulations made from food extracts or constituents with little or no intact food and often containing additives that confer hyper-palatability. The consumption of these products increases the risk of chronic non-communicable diseases. Stressed people may engage in unhealthy eating as a way to cope. This study aimed to verify whether ultra-processed food consumption was associated with perceived stress levels in industrial and retail workers from Vitoria da Conquista, Brazil.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study carried out between July 2017 and August 2018. During the study period, 1270 participants completed a survey administered by an interviewer. Stress levels were assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale. Information regarding weekly ultra-processed food consumption was collected. Ultra-processed foods were classified into four groups: sugary drinks; sugary foods; fast foods; and canned foods, frozen foods, or processed meat. The Student's t-test or one-way analysis of variance was used to assess the differences in stress levels and ultra-processed food consumption. Ordinal regression was used to determine the association between the degrees of stress and ultra-processed food consumption levels.

Results

Factors such as a young age, being unmarried, smoking, high-risk alcohol consumption, negative health perception, and high perceived stress level indicated higher rates of ultra-processed food consumption. Ordinal regression analysis showed that high stress levels were associated with increased odds of higher ultra-processed food consumption (odds ratio: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.54-2.45).

Conclusions

These findings could help identify appropriate target areas for interventions aimed at mental health promotion and healthier food consumption.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.