Randomized controlled trial2021Open access

Effects of Time-Restricted Feeding on Supramaximal Exercise Performance and Body Composition: A Randomized and Counterbalanced Crossover Study in Healthy Men

Correia JM, Santos I, Pezarat-Correia P, Minderico C, Schoenfeld BJ, Mendonca GV

International journal of environmental research and public health · 24 citations

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
University or hospital
Universidade de Lisboa
Government
Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia
Grants
Universidade de Lisboa (J.M.C.-n C00246e); Universidade de Lisboa (UIDB/00447/2020); Universidade de Lisboa (C00246e)

Based on 2 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2021-07-06 · Int J Environ Res Public Health · vol. 18 · issue 14 · p. 7227
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Cited
42 citations · more than 94% of similar papers · 3.5× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
42 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Dietary Effects on Health · Circadian rhythm and melatonin · Diet and metabolism studies
Keywords
Dieting, Crossover study, Meal, Body mass index, Medicine, Anthropometry, Randomized controlled trial, Physical therapy, Animal science, Physiology, Internal medicine, Biology, Obesity, Weight loss, Placebo
MeSH
humans, exercise, fasting, cross-over studies, body composition, energy intake, adult, male, young adult

6 authors

From PT, US

  • Joana M. Correia · correspondingUniversity of Lisbon; Centro Interuniversitário de História das Ciências e da Tecnologia; Centro Interdisciplinar de Estudo da Performance Humana
  • Inês SantosUniversity of Lisbon; Centro de Investigação em Desporto Educação Física Exercício e Saúde; Universidade Lusófona
  • Pedro Luís Camecelha de Pezarat‐CorreiaUniversity of Lisbon; Centro Interuniversitário de História das Ciências e da Tecnologia; Centro Interdisciplinar de Estudo da Performance Humana
  • Cláudia S. MindericoUniversity of Lisbon; Centro Interuniversitário de História das Ciências e da Tecnologia; Centro Interdisciplinar de Estudo da Performance Humana
  • Brad Jon SchoenfeldLehman College
  • Gonçalo V. MendonçaUniversity of Lisbon; Centro Interuniversitário de História das Ciências e da Tecnologia; Centro Interdisciplinar de Estudo da Performance Humana

Abstract

Using a crossover design, we explored the effects of both short- and long-term time-restricted feeding (TRF) vs. regular diet on Wingate (WnT) performance and body composition in well-trained young men. Twelve healthy male physical education students were included (age: 22.4 ± 2.8 years, height: 174.0 ± 7.1 cm, body mass: 73.6 ± 9.5 kg, body mass index: 24.2 ± 2.0 kg/m2). The order of dieting was randomized and counterbalanced, and all participants served as their own controls. TRF was limited to an 8-h eating window and non-TRF involved a customary meal pattern. Participants performed WnT tests and body composition scans at baseline, post-one and post-four weeks of the assigned diet. Before testing, participants were asked to fill out a dietary record over four consecutive days and were instructed to continue their habitual training throughout the study. Energy intake and macronutrient distribution were similar at baseline in both conditions. WnT mean power and total work output increased post-four weeks of TRF. Both conditions were similarly effective in increasing fat-free mass after four weeks of intervention. However, there was no correlation between change in fat-free mass and WnT mean power after TRF. TRF did not elicit any changes in WnT performance or body composition one week post-intervention. Thus, long-term TRF can be used in combination with regular training to improve supramaximal exercise performance in well-trained men.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.