Association of Red Meat and Poultry Consumption With the Risk of Metabolic Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
Guo H, Ding J, Liang J, Zhang Y
Frontiers in nutrition · 15 citations
How it was studied
- Design
- Systematic review (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Clinical events such as disease or death
- Intake measured by
- Not stated
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Independent funding
- University or hospital
- Central South University
- University or hospital
- Xiangya Hospital, Central South University
- Grants
- Xiangya Hospital, Central South University (2020Q14); Central South University (2020Q14)
Based on 2 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.
Publication
- Published
- 2021-07-08 · Front Nutr · vol. 8 · p. 691848
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media
- Cited
- 31 citations · more than 78% of similar papers · 1.4× the field average
- References
- 40 works
- Access
- Open access (journal) · CC-BY
- Research areas
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Keywords
- Red meat, Medicine, Relative risk, Prospective cohort study, Metabolic syndrome, Cohort study, Consumption (sociology), Lower risk, Meta-analysis, Food science, Environmental health, Confidence interval, Internal medicine, Obesity, Biology
4 authors
From CN
- Hongbin GuoCentral South University; Xiangya Hospital Central South University
- Jun DingChangsha University
- Jieyu LiangCentral South University; Xiangya Hospital Central South University
- Yi Zhang · correspondingCentral South University; Xiangya Hospital Central South University
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to investigate the association of red meat (processed and unprocessed) and poultry consumption with the risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS). Methods: Prospective cohort studies on the association of red meat (processed and unprocessed) and poultry consumption with the risk of MetS were identified by comprehensive literature search in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases up to March 2021. The pooled relative risk (RR) of MetS with 95% CIs for the highest vs. lowest category of red meat or poultry consumption was extracted for meta-analysis. Results: A total of nine prospective cohort studies were included in this study. Among them, eight studies were identified for red meat consumption. The overall multi-variable adjusted RR demonstrated that red meat consumption was associated with a higher risk of MetS (RR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.13-1.62; P = 0.001). Moreover, four and three studies were specifically related to processed and unprocessed red meat consumption, respectively. Both processed (RR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.11-1.97; P = 0.007) and unprocessed red meat (RR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.14-1.54; P = 0.0003) consumption was associated with a higher risk of MetS. With regard to poultry consumption, three studies were included. The overall multi-variable adjusted RR suggested that poultry consumption was associated with lower risk of MetS (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75-0.97; P = 0.02). Conclusions: The current evidence indicates that red meat (processed and unprocessed) consumption is associated with a higher risk of MetS, whereas, poultry consumption is associated with a lower risk of MetS. More well-designed randomized controlled trials are still needed to address the issues further.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.