Study2021Open access

Chronic Dialysis Patients Are Depleted of Creatine: Review and Rationale for Intradialytic Creatine Supplementation

van der Veen Y, Post A, Kremer D, Koops CA, Marsman E, Appeldoorn TYJ, Touw DJ, Westerhuis R, Heiner-Fokkema MR, Franssen CFM, Wallimann T, Bakker SJL

Nutrients · 13 citations

Review labels

Author industry ties

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
University or hospital
Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
Authors
At least one author declares a financial tie to industry

Based on 1 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2021-08-06 · Nutrients · vol. 13 · issue 8 · p. 2709
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Cited
20 citations · more than 75% of similar papers · 1.2× the field average
References
86 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Dialysis and Renal Disease Management · Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
Creatine, Medicine, Hemodialysis, Kidney disease, Dialysis, Internal medicine, Creatinine, Creatine Monohydrate, Placebo, Intensive care medicine, Urinary system, Endocrinology, Pathology
MeSH
humans, creatine, treatment outcome, renal dialysis, pilot projects, double-blind method, health status, time factors, dietary supplements, netherlands, renal insufficiency, chronic, randomized controlled trials as topic

12 authors

From NL, CH

  • Yvonne van der Veen · correspondingUniversity Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen
  • Adrian Post · correspondingUniversity Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen
  • Daan KremerUniversity Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen
  • Christa A. KoopsUniversity Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen
  • E. Madelief MarsmanDialyse Centrum Groningen
  • Theo Y. Jerôme AppeldoornUniversity Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen

Abstract

There is great need for the identification of new, potentially modifiable risk factors for the poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and of the excess risk of mortality in dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease patients. Creatine is an essential contributor to cellular energy homeostasis, yet, on a daily basis, 1.6-1.7% of the total creatine pool is non-enzymatically degraded to creatinine and subsequently lost via urinary excretion, thereby necessitating a continuous supply of new creatine in order to remain in steady-state. Because of an insufficient ability to synthesize creatine, unopposed losses to the dialysis fluid, and insufficient intake due to dietary recommendations that are increasingly steered towards more plant-based diets, hemodialysis patients are prone to creatine deficiency, and may benefit from creatine supplementation. To avoid problems with compliance and fluid balance, and, furthermore, to prevent intradialytic losses of creatine to the dialysate, we aim to investigate the potential of intradialytic creatine supplementation in improving outcomes. Given the known physiological effects of creatine, intradialytic creatine supplementation may help to maintain creatine homeostasis among dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease patients, and consequently improve muscle status, nutritional status, neurocognitive status, HRQoL. Additionally, we describe the rationale and design for a block-randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. The aim of the pilot study is to explore the creatine uptake in the circulation and tissues following different creatine supplementation dosages.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.