Cross-sectional study2022Open access

Intake of ultra-processed foods is associated with inflammatory markers in Brazilian adolescents

Martins GMDS, França AKTDC, Viola PCAF, Carvalho CA, Marques KDS, Santos AMD, Batalha MA, Alves JDA, Ribeiro CCC

Public health nutrition · 49 citations

Review labels

Mechanisms onlyNo stated lifestyle adjustment

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Cross-sectional study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Mechanisms only
Intake measured by
Food diaries or recalls

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Nonprofit
Cooley's Anemia Foundation
Government
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Government
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Government
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Maranhão
University or hospital
Universidade Federal do Maranhão
Grants
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior ((Code 001))

Based on 5 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2021-11-02 · Public Health Nutr · vol. 25 · issue 3 · pp. 591–599
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Cited
64 citations · more than 97% of similar papers · 6.1× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
42 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Food composition and properties · Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
Adiponectin, Medicine, C-reactive protein, Population, Leptin, Internal medicine, Inflammation, Obesity, Environmental health
MeSH
humans, interleukin-8, diet, cross-sectional studies, energy intake, food handling, adolescent, brazil, female, male, fast foods

9 authors

From BR

  • Glauciane Márcia dos Santos MartinsHospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Maranhão; Universidade Federal do Maranhão
  • Ana Karina Teixeira da Cunha FrançaUniversidade Federal do Maranhão
  • Poliana Cristina de Almeida Fonseca ViolaUniversidade Federal do Piauí
  • Carolina Abreu de CarvalhoUniversidade Federal do Maranhão
  • Karla Danielle Silva Marques · correspondingUniversidade Federal do Maranhão
  • Alcione Miranda dos SantosUniversidade Federal do Maranhão

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the association of the consumption of foods of the ultra-processed group (UPF) with inflammatory markers in the adolescent population in Northeastern Brazil.

Design

A cross-sectional population-based study. Food consumption was evaluated using two 24-h dietary recalls using the NOVA classification for food processing levels. The following inflammatory markers were evaluated: adiponectin, IL-6, IL-8, C-reactive protein (CRP) and TNF-α. Multivariate linear regression was used to investigate the association between the percentage of UPF energy contribution and inflammatory markers.

Setting

São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.

Participants

The sample consisted of 391 male and female adolescents, aged from 17 to 18 years.

Results

The average daily energy consumption by adolescents was 8032·9 kJ/d, of which 26·1 % originated from UPF. The upper tertile (T3) of UPF consumption presented higher intake of simple carbohydrates, lipids, saturated fat, and Na and lower protein intake. Individuals in T3 presented higher serum leptin and CRP levels (P < 0·05). Adolescents with UPF energy consumption ≥30·0 % (tertile 3 of UPF) had a 79 % (exp (0·58) = 1·79) increase in IL-8 levels when compared with adolescents in tertile 1 of UPF (P = 0·013).

Conclusions

The association between the consumption of UPF, poor quality diet and pro-inflammatory markers have important harmful effects that can be observed as early as in adolescence.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.