Oral Magnesium Supplementation for the Prevention of Preeclampsia: a Meta-analysis or Randomized Controlled Trials
Yuan J, Yu Y, Zhu T, Lin X, Jing X, Zhang J
Biological trace element research · 15 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Clinical events such as disease or death
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2021-11-13 · Biol Trace Elem Res · vol. 200 · issue 8 · pp. 3572–3581
- Publisher
- Springer Science+Business Media
- Cited
- 22 citations · more than 70% of similar papers · 0.9× the field average
- References
- 43 works
- Access
- Paywalled
- Research areas
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies · Magnesium in Health and Disease · Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Keywords
- Medicine, Preeclampsia, Relative risk, Meta-analysis, Subgroup analysis, Randomized controlled trial, Confidence interval, Cochrane Library, Pregnancy, Internal medicine, Incidence (geometry), Obstetrics
- MeSH
- humans, pre-eclampsia, magnesium, pregnancy, dietary supplements, female, randomized controlled trials as topic
6 authors
From CN
- Jing Yuan117th Hospital of People's Liberation Army
- Ying YuZhangqiu City People's Hospital
- Tongyu Zhu · corresponding
- Xiaohan Lin
- Xincheng Jing
- Juan Zhang
Abstract
Previous studies evaluating the role of magnesium supplementation as a preventative strategy for preeclampsia showed inconsistent results. We performed a meta-analysis or randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the influence of oral magnesium supplementation on the incidence of preeclampsia in pregnant women. Relevant studies were obtained by search of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane's Library databases. A random effects model was used to pool the results. Influences of study characteristics of the outcome were evaluated by predefined subgroup analyses. Seven RCTs with 2653 pregnant women were included. Pooled results showed that oral magnesium supplementation during pregnancy significantly reduced the risk of preeclampsia (risk ratio [RR]: 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59 to 0.98, P = 0.04) with no significant heterogeneity (P for Cochrane's Q test = 0.42, I2 = 1%). The result was not significant for the outcome of severe preeclampsia (RR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.18 to 1.69, P = 0.29; I2 = 0%), although only two studies were available. Subgroup analysis showed that oral magnesium supplementation did not significantly reduce the risk of preeclampsia in normal pregnant women (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.67 to 1.25, P = 0.57), but the preventative effect was significant in studies with normal and high-risk pregnant women (RR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.83, P = 0.005; P for subgroup difference = 0.04). In conclusion, oral supplementation of magnesium may reduce the risk of preeclampsia, which may be more remarkable in high-risk pregnant women.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.