Systematic review2021Open access

Smartphone Addiction and Associated Health Outcomes in Adult Populations: A Systematic Review

Ratan ZA, Parrish AM, Zaman SB, Alotaibi MS, Hosseinzadeh H

International journal of environmental research and public health · 124 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Systematic review (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2021-11-22 · Int J Environ Res Public Health · vol. 18 · issue 22 · p. 12257
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Cited
286 citations · more than 99% of similar papers · 9.8× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
69 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Child Development and Digital Technology · COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
smartphone addiction, smartphone overuse, mental health outcomes, anxiety, depression, physical health outcomes, neurological disorders, adults
MeSH
humans, anxiety, mental health, adult, smartphone, outcome assessment, health care, internet addiction disorder

5 authors

From BD, AU, SA

  • Zubair Ahmed RatanKhulna University of Engineering and Technology; University of Wollongong
  • Anne‐Maree Parrish · correspondingUniversity of Wollongong
  • Sojib Bin ZamanMonash Health; Monash University
  • Mohammad Saud AlotaibiUmm al-Qura University; University of Wollongong
  • Hassan Hosseinzadeh · correspondingUniversity of Wollongong

Abstract

Background

Smartphones play a critical role in increasing human-machine interactions, with many advantages. However, the growing popularity of smartphone use has led to smartphone overuse and addiction. This review aims to systematically investigate the impact of smartphone addiction on health outcomes.

Methods

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to carry out the systematic review. Five electronic databases including Medline, Web of Science, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Scopus were searched to identify eligible studies. Eligible studies were screened against predetermined inclusion criteria and data were extracted according to the review questions. This review is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020181404). The quality of the articles was assessed using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies.

Results

A total of 27 of 2550 articles met the inclusion criteria. All of the studies were cross-sectional and focused on physical, mental, and neurological health outcomes. The majority of the studies focused on mental health outcomes and consistent associations were observed between smartphone addiction and several mental health outcomes. Anxiety and depression were commonly found to mediate mental health problems. A wide range of physical health sequelae was also associated with smartphone addiction. Furthermore, there was an association between smartphone addiction and neurological disorders.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that there are consistent associations between smartphone addiction and physical and mental health, especially mental health. Social awareness campaigns about smartphone addiction and its impact on physical and mental health are needed. Further studies, especially randomized controlled trials, are warranted to validate the impacts of smartphone addiction.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.