Meta-analysis2022

Is replacing red meat with other protein sources associated with lower risks of coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality? A meta-analysis of prospective studies

Hidayat K, Chen JS, Wang HP, Wang TC, Liu YJ, Zhang XY, Rao CP, Zhang JW, Qin LQ

Nutrition reviews · 21 citations

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
National Natural Science Foundation of China
University or hospital
State Key Laboratory Open Project of Radiation Medicine and Protection
Grants
National Natural Science Foundation of China (82173502); National Natural Science Foundation of China (82150410453)

Based on 2 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2022-02-13 · Nutr Rev · vol. 80 · issue 9 · pp. 1959–1973
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Cited
36 citations · more than 82% of similar papers · 1.7× the field average
References
59 works
Access
Paywalled
Research areas
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Meat and Animal Product Quality
Keywords
Red meat, Relative risk, Medicine, Meta-analysis, Observational study, Prospective cohort study, Lower risk, Confidence interval, Internal medicine, Pathology
MeSH
animals, humans, vegetables, coronary disease, diet, risk factors, prospective studies, observational studies as topic, red meat

9 authors

From CN

  • Khemayanto Hidayat · correspondingSoochow University
  • Jingsi ChenSoochow University
  • Haipeng WangSoochow University; First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
  • Tianci WangSoochow University
  • Yujie LiuSoochow University
  • Xueying ZhangSuzhou Vocational Health College

Abstract

Context

A high amount of red meat consumption has been associated with higher risks of coronary heart disease (CHD) and all-cause mortality in a single food-exposure model. However, this model may overlook the potentially differential influence of red meat on these outcomes depending on the foods replaced by red meat.

Objective

A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of prospective observational studies was performed to quantify the risks of CHD and all-cause mortality associated with the replacement of total, unprocessed, or processed red meat with fish/seafood, poultry, dairy, eggs, nuts, and legumes.

Data sources

The PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched to identify relevant articles published in any language from database inception to October 30, 2021.

Data extraction

The prospective observational studies were considered relevant if they reported relative risks (RRs) and 95%CIs for the associations of interest.

Data analysis

Thirteen articles were included. A random-effects model was used to estimate the summary RRs and 95%CIs for the associations of interest. Replacing total red meat with poultry (RR, 0.88, 95%CI, 0.82-0.96; I2 = 0%), dairy (RR, 0.90, 95%CI, 0.88-0.92; I2 = 0%), eggs (RR, 0.86, 95%CI, 0.79-0.94; I2 = 7.1%), nuts (RR, 0.84, 95%CI, 0.74-0.95; I2 = 66.8%), or legumes (RR, 0.84, 95%CI, 0.74-0.95; I2 = 7.3%) was associated with a lower risk of CHD, whereas substituting fish/seafood (RR, 0.91, 95%CI, 0.79-1.04; I2 = 69.5%) for total red meat was not associated with the risk of CHD. The replacement of total red meat with fish/seafood (RR, 0.92, 95%CI, 0.89-0.96; I2 = 86.9%), poultry (RR, 0.92, 95%CI, 0.90-0.95; I2 = 61.6%), eggs (RR, 0.91, 95%CI, 0.87-0.95; I2 = 33.8%), or nuts (RR, 0.92, 95%CI, 0.87-0.97; I2 = 81.9%) was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality, whereas the substitution of dairy (RR, 0.97, 95%CI, 0.93-1.01; I2 = 33.9%) or legumes (RR, 0.97, 95%CI, 0.93-1.01; I2 = 53.5%) for total red meat was not associated with the risk of all-cause mortality. Lower risks of CHD and all-cause mortality were more consistently observed for processed red meat replacements than for unprocessed red meat replacements. The results did not materially change when the analyses of total, processed, and unprocessed red meat were restricted to the studies that used a uniform substitution amount per unit of 1 serving/d.

Conclusion

Keeping red meat, particularly processed red meat, consumption to a minimum along with increasing healthier alternative protein sources to replace red meat in the diet may contribute to the prevention of CHD and premature death.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO registration no. CRD42021259446.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.