Does the evidence support a relationship between higher levels of nut consumption, lower risk of depression, and better mood state in the general population? A systematic review
Fernández-Rodríguez R, Fernández-Rodríguez R, Jiménez-López E, Garrido-Miguel M, Martínez-Ortega IA, Martínez-Vizcaíno V, Mesas AE
Nutrition reviews · 21 citations
How it was studied
- Design
- Systematic review (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Health markers and function
- Intake measured by
- Not stated
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Independent funding
- Government
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III
- Government
- European Regional Development Fund
- Industry group
- Nuts4Brain Project
- Unclassified
- “Beatriz Galindo” contract
- Government
- Fondo de Investigación en Salud
- Government
- Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport
Based on 6 listed funder(s).
Publication
- Published
- 2022-03-10 · Nutr Rev · vol. 80 · issue 10 · pp. 2076–2088
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Cited
- 26 citations · more than 71% of similar papers · 1.1× the field average
- References
- 57 works
- Access
- Paywalled
- Research areas
- Nuts composition and effects · Peanut Plant Research Studies · Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Keywords
- Medicine, Mood, Cohort study, Population, Randomized controlled trial, Cohort, Systematic review, Meta-analysis, Observational study, PsycINFO, Depression (economics), Psychiatry, MEDLINE, Environmental health, Internal medicine
- MeSH
- humans, nuts, cohort studies, depression
6 authors
From ES, CL, BR
- Rubén Fernández-RodríguezUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha
- Estela Jiménez‐López · correspondingUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha
- Miriam Garrido‐MiguelUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha
- Isabel Antonia Martínez-OrtegaUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha
- Vicente Martínez‐VizcaínoUniversidad Autónoma de Chile
- Arthur Eumann MesasUniversidade Estadual de Londrina; University of Castilla-La Mancha
Abstract
Context
Dietary patterns play a key role in mental health, depression, and mood state. However, the evidence concerning specific foods highly recommended for mental health, such as nuts, has not yet been synthesized.
Objective
The objective of this review was to synthesize the evidence for a relationship between higher levels of nut consumption, lower risk of depression, and better mood state in the general population.
Data sources
The MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and PsycInfo databases were systematically searched from each database's inception to March 2021.
Data extraction
Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies exploring the association between nut consumption, level of depression, and mood state in the general population were included. The quality of the studies was measured through the Joanna Briggs Institute tool (cross-sectional studies), the NIH Quality Assessment Tool (cohort studies), and the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool (RCTs). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed.
Data analysis
A total of 10 studies involving 66 418 individuals were included, of which 3 were cross-sectional, 3 were cohort studies, and 4 were RCTs. In studies concerned with depression (n = 6 studies), a higher level of nut consumption was associated with a lower risk of depression in 2 cross-sectional studies and 1 cohort study, while a similar but nonsignificant association was found in another cohort and in two RCTs. In studies concerned with mood state (n = 4), 1 cohort study reported an association between higher nut consumption and significant improvement in mood state, whereas (nonsignificant) associations between higher nut consumption and increased negative feelings were reported in a cross-sectional study and two RCTs.
Conclusion
Despite the small number of studies and the limitations related to them, such as reverse causation bias, overall, the available literature suggests that higher nut consumption could be associated with a lower risk of depression, fewer depressive symptoms, and better mood state in the general population.
Systematic review registration
PROSPERO registration no. CRD42021241070.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.