Egg Consumption and Risk of All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies
Mousavi SM, Zargarzadeh N, Rigi S, Persad E, Pizarro AB, Hasani-Ranjbar S, Larijani B, Willett WC, Esmaillzadeh A
Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 26 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Clinical events such as disease or death
- Intake measured by
- Not stated
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2022-04-09 · Adv Nutr · vol. 13 · issue 5 · pp. 1762–1773
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Cited
- 31 citations · more than 80% of similar papers · 1.5× the field average
- References
- 104 works
- Access
- Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY-NC-ND
- Research areas
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Keywords
- Medicine, Relative risk, Meta-analysis, Population, Cohort study, Internal medicine, Prospective cohort study, MEDLINE, Confidence interval, Environmental health, Biology
- MeSH
- humans, neoplasms, cardiovascular diseases, coronary disease, cause of death, prospective studies, stroke
9 authors
From IR, AT, CO, US
- Seyed Mohammad MousaviObesity and Eating Habits Research Center; Tehran University of Medical Sciences
- Nikan ZargarzadehTehran University of Medical Sciences
- Somaye RigiTehran University of Medical Sciences
- Emma PersadUniversität für Weiterbildung Krems
- Ana Beatriz PizarroFundación Valle del Lili
- Shirin Hasani‐RanjbarObesity and Eating Habits Research Center; Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Abstract
The association between egg consumption and mortality is extremely debatable. This study aimed to investigate the potential dose-response association of egg consumption with risk of mortality from all causes and cause-specific in the general population. The primary comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and Embase up to March 2021, as well as reference lists of relevant original papers and key journals. We calculated summary RRs and their 95% CIs for the highest and lowest categories, as well as the linear trend estimation of egg intake, using the random-effects model. Thirty-three (32 publications) cohort studies were included. These studies enrolled 2,216,720 participants and recorded 232,408 deaths from all causes. Comparing highest versus lowest egg intake categories was not associated with the risk of mortality from all causes (RR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.94, 1.11; n = 25), cardiovascular disease (CVD) (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.87, 1.23, n = 11), coronary heart disease (CHD) (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.84, 1.16; n = 10), stroke (RR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.64, 1.02; n = 9), and respiratory disease (RR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.53, 1.71; n = 3); however, it was associated with a higher risk of cancer mortality (RR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.39; n = 13). In the linear dose-response analysis, an additional intake of 1 egg per week was associated with a 2% and 4% increased risk of all-cause and cancer mortality, respectively, and a 4% decreased risk of stroke mortality. The certainty of the evidence was rated as low to moderate. Higher egg consumption was not associated with an increased risk of mortality from all causes, CVD, CHD, stroke, or respiratory disease, whereas an elevated risk was observed for cancer mortality. These findings suggest that eggs be consumed in low to moderate amounts (≤1 egg/d) as part of a healthy diet.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY-NC-ND).
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.