Cross-sectional study2022Open access

Degree of food processing and association with overweight and abdominal obesity in adolescents

Souza SF, Conceição-Machado MEPD, Costa PRF, Cunha CM, Queiroz VAO, Santana MLP, Leite LO, Assis AMO

Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 7 citations

Review labels

Food frequency questionnaireNo stated lifestyle adjustment

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Cross-sectional study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Food frequency questionnaire

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Government
Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação
Government
Ministério da Educação

Based on 3 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2022-01-01 · Einstein (Sao Paulo) · vol. 20 · p. eAO6619
Publisher
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
Cited
11 citations · more than 74% of similar papers · 1.0× the field average
References
29 works
Access
Open access (free to publish) · CC-BY
Research areas
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
Overweight, Waist, Quartile, Abdominal obesity, Medicine, Obesity, Body mass index, Waist-to-height ratio, Confidence interval, Cross-sectional study, Environmental health, Demography, Internal medicine
MeSH
humans, body mass index, diet, cross-sectional studies, food handling, adolescent, female, male, overweight, obesity, abdominal, pediatric obesity

8 authors

From BR

  • Sineide Freitas de Souza · correspondingUniversidade Federal da Bahia; Universidade Salvador
  • Maria Ester Pereira da Conceição‐MachadoUniversidade Federal da Bahia; Universidade Salvador
  • Priscila Ribas de Farias CostaUniversidade Federal da Bahia; Universidade Salvador
  • Carla de Magalhães CunhaUniversidade Federal da Bahia; Universidade Salvador
  • Valterlinda Alves de Oliveira QueirozUniversidade Federal da Bahia; Universidade Salvador
  • Mônica Leila Portela de SantanaUniversidade Federal da Bahia; Universidade Salvador

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the association between the degree of food processing, overweight, and abdominal obesity in adolescents.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study, with 576 adolescents aged 10 to 17 years, of both sexes. Food consumption was collected using the Food Frequency Questionnaire and foods classified as in natura or minimally processed, processed foods associated with culinary ingredients, and ultraprocessed foods. Sociodemographic data, body mass index, waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio were collected. The analysis was evaluated by the Mann-Whitney test and prevalence ratio with 95% confidence interval, considering p<0.05.

Results

An intake above the third quartile of processed foods associated with culinary ingredients (prevalence ratio of 1.64; 95%CI: 1.12-2.42) and ultraprocessed (prevalence ratio of 1.58; 95%CI: 1.07-2.34) was associated with a higher prevalence of overweight. Consumption above the third quartile of ultraprocessed foods was associated with a higher prevalence of abdominal obesity, assessed by waist circumference (prevalence ratio of 2.48; 95%CI: 1.41-4.36), and waist-height ratio (prevalence ratio of 2.09; 95%CI: 1.11-3.92).

Conclusion

A higher consumption of processed foods associated with culinary ingredients was related to being overweight, and ultraprocessed foods with overweight and abdominal obesity.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.