International society of sports nutrition position stand: tactical athlete nutrition
Gonzalez DE, McAllister MJ, Waldman HS, Ferrando AA, Joyce J, Barringer ND, Dawes JJ, Kieffer AJ, Harvey T, Kerksick CM, Stout JR, Ziegenfuss TN, Zapp A, Tartar JL, Heileson JL, VanDusseldorp TA, Kalman DS, Campbell BI, Antonio J, Kreider RB
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 34 citations
How it was studied
- Design
- Expert or government fact sheet (classified by our AI screen)
- Main outcome
- No health outcome
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Independent funding
- Unclassified
- The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article
Based on 1 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.
Publication
- Published
- 2022-06-23 · J Int Soc Sports Nutr · vol. 19 · issue 1 · pp. 267–315
- Publisher
- Springer Science+Business Media
- Cited
- 62 citations · more than 97% of similar papers · 5.1× the field average
- Impact
- Top 10% most cited in its field
- References
- 305 works
- Access
- Open access (journal) · OTHER-OA
- Research areas
- Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Occupational Health and Performance · Thermoregulation and physiological responses
- Keywords
- Medicine, Clinical nutrition, Athletes, Sports nutrition, Sports medicine, Population, Environmental health, Calorie, Gerontology, Physical therapy
- MeSH
- humans, exercise, diet, energy intake, nutritional requirements, athletes, sports nutritional sciences
20 authors
From US
- Drew Edward Gonzalez · correspondingTexas A&M University
- Matthew John McAllisterTexas State University
- Hunter S. WaldmanUniversity of North Alabama
- Arny A. FerrandoUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
- Jill JoyceOklahoma State University
- N Barringer
Abstract
This position stand aims to provide an evidence-based summary of the energy and nutritional demands of tactical athletes to promote optimal health and performance while keeping in mind the unique challenges faced due to work schedules, job demands, and austere environments. After a critical analysis of the literature, the following nutritional guidelines represent the position of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN).
General recommendations
Nutritional considerations should include the provision and timing of adequate calories, macronutrients, and fluid to meet daily needs as well as strategic nutritional supplementation to improve physical, cognitive, and occupational performance outcomes; reduce risk of injury, obesity, and cardiometabolic disease; reduce the potential for a fatal mistake; and promote occupational readiness.
Military recommendations
Energy demands should be met by utilizing the Military Dietary Reference Intakes (MDRIs) established and codified in Army Regulation 40-25. Although research is somewhat limited, military personnel may also benefit from caffeine, creatine monohydrate, essential amino acids, protein, omega-3-fatty acids, beta-alanine, and L-tyrosine supplementation, especially during high-stress conditions.
First responder recommendations
Specific energy needs are unknown and may vary depending on occupation-specific tasks. It is likely the general caloric intake and macronutrient guidelines for recreational athletes or the Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Ranges for the general healthy adult population may benefit first responders. Strategies such as implementing wellness policies, setting up supportive food environments, encouraging healthier food systems, and using community resources to offer evidence-based nutrition classes are inexpensive and potentially meaningful ways to improve physical activity and diet habits. The following provides a more detailed overview of the literature and recommendations for these populations.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.