Cohort study2022

Periconceptional and First Trimester Ultraprocessed Food Intake and Maternal Cardiometabolic Outcomes

Yisahak SF, Hinkle SN, Mumford SL, Gleason JL, Grantz KL, Zhang C, Grewal J

Diabetes care · 7 citations

Review labels

Food frequency questionnaireNo stated lifestyle adjustment

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Cohort study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Food frequency questionnaire

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Nonprofit
American Diabetes Association
University or hospital
Northwestern University
University or hospital
University of South Carolina
Government
National Institutes of Health
University or hospital
University of California, Irvine
Government
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Government
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Government
NICHD NIH HHS
Grants
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN275200800012C); National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN275200800013C); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN275200800014C); National Institutes of Health (HHSN27500006); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN275201000009C); National Institutes of Health (HHSN275 200800012C); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN27500006); National Institutes of Health (HHSN275200800028C); National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN 275200800002I); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN275200800013C); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN275 200800028C); National Institutes of Health (HHSN275200800013C); National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN27500006); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN275200800002I); National Institutes of Health (HHSN275200800002I); National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN275200800014C); National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN275200800028C)

Based on 8 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2022-07-19 · Diabetes Care · vol. 45 · issue 9 · pp. 2028–2036
Publisher
American Diabetes Association
Cited
22 citations · more than 94% of similar papers · 3.9× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
37 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Gestational Diabetes Research and Management · Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
Medicine, Pregnancy, Gestational diabetes, Obstetrics, Odds ratio, Quartile, Population, Preeclampsia, Gestational hypertension, Blood pressure, Diabetes mellitus, Body mass index, Glycemic, Gestation, Prospective cohort study, Weight gain, Confounding, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Confidence interval, Environmental health, Body weight
MeSH
humans, diabetes, gestational, hypertension, blood glucose, body mass index, prospective studies, pregnancy, pregnancy trimester, first, eating, female

7 authors

From US, SG

  • Samrawit F. YisahakNational Institutes of Health; Office of the Director; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Stefanie N. HinkleUniversity of Pennsylvania
  • Sunni L. MumfordUniversity of Pennsylvania
  • Jessica L. GleasonNational Institutes of Health; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Katherine L. GrantzNational Institutes of Health; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Cuilin ZhangNational University of Singapore

Abstract

Objective

Ultraprocessed foods (UPFs) have been linked with obesity and cardiometabolic diseases in the general population but are understudied in pregnancy. We examined associations of UPF intake with gestational weight gain (GWG), glycemic, and blood pressure outcomes in pregnancy.

Research design and methods

Pregnant women (n = 1,948) in a prospective U.S. cohort self-reported the past 3-month diet using a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) at 8-13 weeks of gestation. The intake quantity (g/day) of foods and beverages identified as UPFs was ranked into quartiles. Associations of UPFs were evaluated, after adjusting for confounders, with 2nd and 3rd trimester Institute of Medicine (IOM) GWG categories, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (GHTN). Secondary outcomes included GWG rate, glucose challenge test 1-h glucose, and blood pressure trajectories from linear mixed models.

Results

A total of 492 (25.2%) and 699 women (35.9%) had 2nd and 3rd trimester excessive GWG, respectively, and 85 women (4.4%) had GDM and 63 (3.2%) had severe hypertension or preeclampsia. UPF intake was not associated with higher odds of excessive GWG (quartile 4 vs. 1: adjusted odds ratio 0.68 [95% CI 0.44, 1.05], P-trend = 0.10 for 2nd trimester) or GDM risk (quartile 4 vs. 1: adjusted risk ratio 0.99 [95% CI 0.46, 2.11], P-trend = 0.85). Although UPF intake was positively associated with minor differences blood pressure trajectories, associations with GHTN were null.

Conclusions

The expected unfavorable association of higher UPF intake with excessive GWG, GDM, and GHTN was not observed in our cohort of low-risk pregnant women. These results are based on a limited sample size and require replication.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.