Magnesium Intake, <i>C</i>-Reactive Protein, and Muscle Mass in Adolescents
Dong Y, Chen L, Gutin B, Huang Y, Dong Y, Zhu H
Nutrients · 10 citations
How it was studied
- Design
- Cross-sectional study (classified by our AI screen)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Health markers and function
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Independent funding
- Nonprofit
- American Heart Association
- Government
- National Institutes of Health
- Government
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
- Government
- NIH HHS
- Government
- National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute
- Government
- NHLBI NIH HHS
- Grants
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL064157); American Heart Association (14GRANT20480211); American Heart Association (16GRANT31250002); National Institutes of Health (HL64157)
Based on 6 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.
Publication
- Published
- 2022-07-14 · Nutrients · vol. 14 · issue 14 · p. 2882
- Publisher
- Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
- Cited
- 15 citations · more than 79% of similar papers · 1.4× the field average
- References
- 56 works
- Access
- Open access (journal) · CC-BY
- Research areas
- Magnesium in Health and Disease · Therapeutic Uses of Natural Elements · Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Keywords
- C-reactive protein, Muscle mass, Chemistry, Food science, Medicine, Endocrinology, Internal medicine, Inflammation
- MeSH
- muscle, skeletal, humans, magnesium, c-reactive protein, diet, body composition, adolescent, female, male
6 authors
From US
- Yutong DongAugusta University; Prevention Institute; NYU Langone Health
- Li ChenAugusta University; Prevention Institute
- Bernard GutinAugusta University; Prevention Institute
- Ying HuangAugusta University; Prevention Institute
- Yanbin DongAugusta University; Prevention Institute; NYU Langone Health
- Haidong Zhu · correspondingAugusta University; Prevention Institute
Abstract
Background: Adult studies have suggested that magnesium intake may regulate C-reactive protein (CRP) and muscle mass, known risk factors for cardiometabolic diseases. Given the large deficiencies in magnesium intake in adolescents, we aimed to investigate sex and race differences in dietary magnesium intake and test the hypothesis that lower magnesium intake is associated with higher CRP and lower muscle mass. Methods: A total of 766 black and white adolescents, 14 to 18 years old (51% black; 50% female) were previously recruited. Diet was assessed with four to seven independent 24-h recalls. Body composition was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. High-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP), leptin, resistin, and adiponectin were measured using fasting blood samples by ELISA. Results: There were sex and race differences in the daily consumption of magnesium. The average daily magnesium intakes were 200.66 ± 7.09 mg and 205.03 ± 7.05 mg for males and females, respectively, far below the recommended amounts of 410 mg for males and 360 mg for females. White subjects (217.95 ± 6.81 mg/day) consumed more than black subjects (187.75 ± 6.92 mg/day). Almost none of the adolescents met the recommendations. Adjusted multiple linear regressions revealed that lower magnesium intake was associated with higher hs-CRP and lower fat-free mass (FFM) (p-values < 0.05). Higher hs-CRP was associated with lower FFM. Moreover, an interaction between magnesium intake and hs-CRP on FFM was identified (p-value < 0.05). Lower magnesium intake amplified the inverse relationships between hs-CRP and FFM (p-values < 0.05). Conclusion: Magnesium consumption in our adolescents was far below daily recommended levels with male and black subjects consuming less than female and white subjects. Lower magnesium intake was associated with higher CRP and lower muscle mass. Low magnesium intake may also augment the inverse relationship between CRP and FFM.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.