Study2022Open access

Magnesium Intake, <i>C</i>-Reactive Protein, and Muscle Mass in Adolescents

Dong Y, Chen L, Gutin B, Huang Y, Dong Y, Zhu H

Nutrients · 10 citations

How it was studied

Design
Cross-sectional study (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Nonprofit
American Heart Association
Government
National Institutes of Health
Government
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Government
NIH HHS
Government
National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute
Government
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grants
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL064157); American Heart Association (14GRANT20480211); American Heart Association (16GRANT31250002); National Institutes of Health (HL64157)

Based on 6 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2022-07-14 · Nutrients · vol. 14 · issue 14 · p. 2882
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Cited
15 citations · more than 79% of similar papers · 1.4× the field average
References
56 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Magnesium in Health and Disease · Therapeutic Uses of Natural Elements · Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
C-reactive protein, Muscle mass, Chemistry, Food science, Medicine, Endocrinology, Internal medicine, Inflammation
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, humans, magnesium, c-reactive protein, diet, body composition, adolescent, female, male

6 authors

From US

  • Yutong DongAugusta University; Prevention Institute; NYU Langone Health
  • Li ChenAugusta University; Prevention Institute
  • Bernard GutinAugusta University; Prevention Institute
  • Ying HuangAugusta University; Prevention Institute
  • Yanbin DongAugusta University; Prevention Institute; NYU Langone Health
  • Haidong Zhu · correspondingAugusta University; Prevention Institute

Abstract

Background: Adult studies have suggested that magnesium intake may regulate C-reactive protein (CRP) and muscle mass, known risk factors for cardiometabolic diseases. Given the large deficiencies in magnesium intake in adolescents, we aimed to investigate sex and race differences in dietary magnesium intake and test the hypothesis that lower magnesium intake is associated with higher CRP and lower muscle mass. Methods: A total of 766 black and white adolescents, 14 to 18 years old (51% black; 50% female) were previously recruited. Diet was assessed with four to seven independent 24-h recalls. Body composition was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. High-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP), leptin, resistin, and adiponectin were measured using fasting blood samples by ELISA. Results: There were sex and race differences in the daily consumption of magnesium. The average daily magnesium intakes were 200.66 ± 7.09 mg and 205.03 ± 7.05 mg for males and females, respectively, far below the recommended amounts of 410 mg for males and 360 mg for females. White subjects (217.95 ± 6.81 mg/day) consumed more than black subjects (187.75 ± 6.92 mg/day). Almost none of the adolescents met the recommendations. Adjusted multiple linear regressions revealed that lower magnesium intake was associated with higher hs-CRP and lower fat-free mass (FFM) (p-values < 0.05). Higher hs-CRP was associated with lower FFM. Moreover, an interaction between magnesium intake and hs-CRP on FFM was identified (p-value < 0.05). Lower magnesium intake amplified the inverse relationships between hs-CRP and FFM (p-values < 0.05). Conclusion: Magnesium consumption in our adolescents was far below daily recommended levels with male and black subjects consuming less than female and white subjects. Lower magnesium intake was associated with higher CRP and lower muscle mass. Low magnesium intake may also augment the inverse relationship between CRP and FFM.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.