Randomized controlled trial2022Open access

A randomized open-labeled study to examine the effects of creatine monohydrate and combined training on jump and scoring performance in young basketball players

Vargas-Molina S, García-Sillero M, Kreider RB, Salinas E, Petro JL, Benítez-Porres J, Bonilla DA

Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 7 citations

Review labels

Author industry ties

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
University or hospital
Universidad de Málaga
Government
International Excellence Andalucía Tech
University or hospital
the University of Málaga
Authors
At least one author declares a financial tie to industry

Based on 3 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2022-08-08 · J Int Soc Sports Nutr · vol. 19 · issue 1 · pp. 529–542
Publisher
Springer Science+Business Media
Cited
23 citations · more than 78% of similar papers · 1.4× the field average
References
46 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Exercise and Physiological Responses · Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Keywords
Basketball, Medicine, Plyometrics, Physical therapy, Jump, Vertical jump, Athletes, Mathematics
MeSH
humans, creatine, basketball, male, muscle strength, athletic performance, resistance training

7 authors

From ES, US, CO

  • Salvador Vargas-MolinaUniversidad de Málaga
  • Manuel García-Sillero
  • Richard B. KreiderTexas A&M University
  • Enrique Salinas
  • Jorge Luis PetroUniversity of Córdoba
  • Javier Benítez‐Porres · correspondingUniversidad de Málaga

Abstract

Background

Creatine monohydrate (CrM) supplementation has been shown to be an effective and safe nutritional supplement to improve performance; however, the impact of CrM supplementation in young basketball players is less clear. This study evaluated the effects of CrM supplementation during a strength and conditioning training (SCT) program on lower-limb strength parameters and performance in under-16 (U16) basketball players.

Methods

Twenty-three male U16 basketball players participated in this study (14.3 ± 0.4 years; BMI: 20.7 ± 2.2 kg∙m-2). The players were randomly assigned to either a CrM group (n = 12) that ingested 0.1 g·kg-1·day-1 of CrM or to a non-supplemented control group (n = 11, CON). The athletes participated in an 8-week SCT program consisting of two lower-limb resistance-training sessions and two plyometric sessions per week. Squat jump (SJ), drop jump (DP), countermovement jump (CMJ), and Abalakov (ABK) jump power tests as well as basketball performance (points and minutes per game) were measured before, during and/or after the intervention. Data were analyzed using a general linear model with repeated measures with independent Student's t-test pairwise comparisons.

Results

The results (95% confidence interval for mean change from baseline) show that there were significant differences for all variables for CrM and CON, respectively: SJ (cm): 2.6 - 6.4, P p = 0.003, ηp 2 = 0.342) was observed in ABK performance. No significant group x time effects were seen in squat jump (p = 0.449, ηp 2 = 0.028), drop jump (p = 0.143, ηp 2 = 0.099), or counter movement jump (p = 0.304, ηp 2 = 0.05). A significant interaction effect was also observed in points per game (p = 0.049, ηp 2 = 0.149), while a non-significant but medium effect was seen in minutes per game (p = 0.166, ηp 2 = 0.094).

Conclusions

CrM supplementation in conjunction with resistance and plyometric training increased the lower-limb ABK power and scoring performance in U16 basketball players.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.