Study2022Open access

Carbohydrate utilization by the gut microbiome determines host health responsiveness to whole grain type and processing methods

Smith C, Van Haute MJ, Xian Y, Segura Munoz RR, Liu S, Schmaltz RJ, Ramer-Tait AE, Rose DJ

Gut microbes · 12 citations

How it was studied

Design
Animal study (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
Animals
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
University or hospital
funding from the Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station Hatch Multistate Research capacity
University or hospital
Nebraska Food for Health Center

Based on 2 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2022-09-21 · Gut Microbes · vol. 14 · issue 1 · p. 2126275
Publisher
Landes Bioscience
Cited
20 citations · more than 76% of similar papers · 1.1× the field average
References
65 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Gut microbiota and health · Food composition and properties · Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
Microbiome, Biology, Lachnospiraceae, Food science, Whole grains, Carbohydrate, Bacteria, Biochemistry, Bioinformatics, Genetics, Firmicutes
MeSH
animals, humans, mice, triticum, blood glucose, fatty acids, volatile, diet, edible grain, gastrointestinal microbiome, whole grains

8 authors

From US, DE

  • Caroline Anne SmithUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln; Ardent Sound (United States)
  • Mallory J. Suhr Van HauteUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln; Synergy Health
  • Yibo XianUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln
  • Rafael R. Segura MuñozUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln; Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology
  • Sujun LiuUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln
  • Robert J. SchmaltzUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln

Abstract

Little is known about how interactions among grain processing, grain type, and carbohydrate utilization (CU) by the microbiome influence the health benefits of whole grains. Therefore, two whole grains - brown rice and whole wheat - and two processing methods - boiling (porridge) and extrusion - were studied for their effects on host metabolic outcomes in mice harboring human microbiomes previously shown in vitro to have high or low CU. Mice carrying either microbiome experienced increases in body weight and glycemia when consuming Western diets supplemented with extruded grains versus porridge. However, mice with the high but not low CU microbiome also gained more weight and fat over time and were less glucose tolerant when consuming extruded grain diets. In high CU microbiome mice, the exacerbated negative health outcomes associated with extrusion were related to altered abundances of Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae as well as elevated sugar degradation and colonic acetate production. The amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) associated with extruded and porridge diets in this in vivo study were not the same as those identified in our prior in vitro study; however, the predicted functions were highly correlated. In conclusion, mice harboring both high and low CU microbiomes responded to the whole grain diets similarly, except the high CU microbiome mice exhibited exacerbated effects due to excessive acetate production, indicating that CU by the microbiome is linked to host metabolic health outcomes. Our work demonstrates that a greater understanding of food processing effects on the microbiome is necessary for developing foods that promote rather than diminish host health.Abbreviations: CU- carbohydrate utilization; SCFA- short-chain fatty acids; GF- germ-free; HMA, human-microbiome associated; ipGTT- intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test; HOMA-IR- Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance; AUC- area under the glycemia curve; ASV- amplicon sequence variant; lf- low-fat; wd- Western diet; wd_wwp- Western diet containing whole wheat porridge; wd_wwe- Western diet containing whole wheat extrudate; wd_bre- Western diet containing brown rice extrudate; wd_extr- Western diet containing either whole wheat or brown rice extrudate.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.