Study2022Open access

Impact of fibre and red/processed meat intake on treatment outcomes among patients with chronic inflammatory diseases initiating biological therapy: A prospective cohort study

Overgaard SH, Sørensen SB, Munk HL, Nexøe AB, Glerup H, Henriksen RH, Guldmann T, Pedersen N, Saboori S, Hvid L, Dahlerup JF, Hvas CL, Jawhara M, Andersen KW, Pedersen AK, Nielsen OH, Bergenheim F, Brodersen JB, Heitmann BL, Halldorsson TI, Holmskov U, Bygum A, Christensen R, Kjeldsen J, Ellingsen T, Andersen V

Frontiers in nutrition · 16 citations

Review labels

Author industry tiesFood frequency questionnaireLumps processed with unprocessed meatNo stated lifestyle adjustment

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Cohort study (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Food frequency questionnaire

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Nonprofit
Oak Foundation
Nonprofit
Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy
Government
European Commission
University or hospital
Odense Universitetshospital
Nonprofit
Knud og Edith Eriksens Mindefond
Government
Horizon 2020
Authors
At least one author declares a financial tie to industry
Grants
Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy (OCAY-18-774-OFIL); European Commission (HORIZON2020); European Commission (733100)

Based on 6 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2022-10-13 · Front Nutr · vol. 9 · p. 985732
Publisher
Frontiers Media
Cited
17 citations · more than 90% of similar papers · 2.4× the field average
References
55 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Inflammatory Bowel Disease · Gut microbiota and health · Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Keywords
Medicine, Prospective cohort study, Cohort, Cohort study, Internal medicine, Intensive care medicine

26 authors

From DK, IS

  • Silja Hvid Overgaard · correspondingUniversity of Southern Denmark; Frederiksberg Hospital
  • Signe Bek SørensenUniversity of Southern Denmark
  • Heidi Lausten MunkUniversity of Southern Denmark; Odense University Hospital
  • Anders Bathum NexøeUniversity of Southern Denmark; Odense University Hospital
  • Henning GlerupRegionshospitalet Silkeborg
  • Rikke Holm HenriksenRegionshospitalet Silkeborg

Abstract

Background

Biologic disease-modifying drugs have revolutionised the treatment of a number of chronic inflammatory diseases (CID). However, up to 60% of the patients do not have a sufficient response to treatment and there is a need for optimization of treatment strategies.

Objective

To investigate if the treatment outcome of biological therapy is associated with the habitual dietary intake of fibre and red/processed meat in patients with a CID.

Methods

In this multicentre prospective cohort study, we consecutively enrolled 233 adult patients with a diagnosis of Crohn's Disease, Ulcerative Colitis, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Axial Spondyloarthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis and Psoriasis, for whom biologic therapy was planned, over a 3 year period. Patients with completed baseline food frequency questionnaires were stratified into a high fibre/low red and processed meat exposed group (HFLM) and an unexposed group (low fibre/high red and processed meat intake = LFHM). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a clinical response to biologic therapy after 14-16 weeks of treatment.

Results

Of the 193 patients included in our primary analysis, 114 (59%) had a clinical response to biologic therapy. In the HFLM group (N = 64), 41 (64%) patients responded to treatment compared to 73 (56%) in the LFHM group (N = 129), but the difference was not statistically significant (OR: 1.48, 0.72-3.05). For RA patients however, HFLM diet was associated with a more likely clinical response (82% vs. 35%; OR: 9.84, 1.35-71.56).

Conclusion

Habitual HFLM intake did not affect the clinical response to biological treatment across CIDs. HFLM diet in RA patients might be associated with better odds for responding to biological treatment, but this would need confirmation in a randomised trial.

Trial registration

(clinicaltrials.gov), identifier [NCT03173144].

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.