Association of egg intake with risks of cardiometabolic factors among adults in China
Jiao Y, Li W, Jiang H, Wang L, Wang S, Hao L, Jia X, Wang Z, Wang H, Zhang B, Ding G
Frontiers in public health · 2 citations
How it was studied
- Design
- Cohort study (classified by our AI screen)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Clinical events such as disease or death
- Intake measured by
- Food diaries or recalls
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Independent funding
- Government
- Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention
- Government
- National Institute for Nutrition and Health
- University or hospital
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Government
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- University or hospital
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Government
- NICHD NIH HHS
- Grants
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD030880); National Institute for Nutrition and Health (DK056350); Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (R01-HD38700); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (R24 HD050924); National Institute for Nutrition and Health (R24 HD050924); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD038700); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (R01-HD38700); Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (R24HD050924); Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (HD050924); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (and R01-HD38700); Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (DK056350); Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (2020YFC2006300); Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (R01-HD38700); Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (DK056350); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (R01-HD30880); National Institute for Nutrition and Health (R01-HD30880); Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (R01-HD30880); Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (R24 HD050924); Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (R01-HD30880); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (DK056350)
Based on 6 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.
Publication
- Published
- 2022-10-26 · Front Public Health · vol. 10 · p. 1010539
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media
- Cited
- 4 citations · more than 72% of similar papers · 0.8× the field average
- References
- 32 works
- Access
- Open access (journal) · CC-BY
- Research areas
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Birth, Development, and Health · Phytoestrogen effects and research
- Keywords
- China, Environmental health, Association (psychology), Medicine, Demography, Psychology, Geography
- MeSH
- humans, hypertension, obesity, blood glucose, risk factors, adult, china, obesity, abdominal, metabolic syndrome
11 authors
From CN
- Yingying JiaoChinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention; National Institute for Nutrition and Health
- Weiyi LiChinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention; National Health and Family Planning Commission; Chinese Nutrition Society; National Institute for Nutrition and Health
- Hongru JiangChinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention; National Health and Family Planning Commission; Chinese Nutrition Society; National Institute for Nutrition and Health
- Liusen WangChinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention; National Health and Family Planning Commission; Chinese Nutrition Society; National Institute for Nutrition and Health
- Shaoshunzi WangChinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention; National Health and Family Planning Commission; National Institute for Nutrition and Health
- Lixin HaoChinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention; National Health and Family Planning Commission; National Institute for Nutrition and Health
Abstract
Objective
To explore the association between egg intake and cardiometabolic factors (CMFs) in Chinese adults.
Method
The subjects were 6,182 adults aged 18-64 who had complete survey data and had no CMFs at baseline. Egg intake was assessed with 3 days-24 h dietary recalls in all waves of the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS). Multivariate Cox proportional risk regression model and restricted cubic spline (RCS) model were used to analyze the association and dose-response relationship between egg intake and CMFs.
Results
Of the 6,182 participants who did not have metabolic syndrome (MetS) at baseline, 1,921 developed this disease during an average follow-up of 5.71 years, with an incidence of 31.07%. Central obesity, elevated TG, decreased HDL-C, elevated blood pressure and elevated plasma glucose were 38.65, 26.74, 30.21, 40.64, and 30.64%, respectively. After adjusting for demographic characteristics, lifestyle, energy and BMI, using the lowest quintile (Q1) as a reference, the risk of central obesity, elevated TG, decreased HDL-C, and elevated plasma glucose in the highest quintile (Q5) were reduced by 15% (HR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.73-0.98, P = 0.16), 33% (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.57-0.78), 25% (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.63 0.90, p = 0.05), and 28% (HR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.63-0.83, p P = 0.85). RCS analysis show that the overall correlation and nonlinear relationship between egg intake and CMFs were statistically significant (P < 0.05). When the intake was lower than 20 g/days, the risk of MetS, central obesity, elevated blood pressure and elevated plasma glucose were negatively correlated with egg intake, while elevated TG was negatively correlated with eggs when the intake was lower than 60 g/days. There was no statistically significant association between egg intake and CMFs at higher egg intake.
Conclusion
There was a U-shaped association between egg intake and CMFs in Chinese adults.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.