Red/processed meat consumption and non-cancer-related outcomes in humans: umbrella review
Zhang X, Liang S, Chen X, Yang J, Zhou Y, Du L, Li K
The British journal of nutrition · 23 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Systematic review (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Clinical events such as disease or death
- Intake measured by
- Not stated
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2022-12-22 · Br J Nutr · vol. 130 · issue 3 · pp. 484–494
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Cited
- 35 citations · more than 96% of similar papers · 5.1× the field average
- Impact
- Top 10% most cited in its field
- References
- 62 works
- Access
- Paywalled
- Research areas
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Keywords
- Red meat, Processed meat, Medicine, Meta-analysis, Cochrane Library, Diabetes mellitus, Stroke (engine), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Environmental health, Internal medicine, Food science, Endocrinology, Pathology, Biology
- MeSH
- humans, diabetes mellitus, type 2, diet, risk factors, meat, meat products, meta-analysis as topic, stroke, red meat, systematic reviews as topic
7 authors
From CN
- Xingxia ZhangSichuan University; West China Hospital of Sichuan University
- Shiqi LiangSichuan University; West China Medical Center of Sichuan University
- Xinrong ChenSichuan University; West China Medical Center of Sichuan University
- Jie YangSichuan University
- Yong ZhouSichuan University
- Liang Du
Abstract
The associations of red/processed meat consumption and cancer-related health outcomes have been well discussed. The umbrella review aimed to summarise the associations of red/processed meat consumption and various non-cancer-related outcomes in humans. We systematically searched the systematic reviews and meta-analyses of associations between red/processed meat intake and health outcomes from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library databases. The umbrella review has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD 42021218568). A total of 40 meta-analyses were included. High consumption of red meat, particularly processed meat, was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality, CVD and metabolic outcomes. Dose-response analysis revealed that an additional 100 g/d red meat intake was positively associated with a 17 % increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), 15 % increased risk of CHD, 14 % of hypertension and 12 % of stroke. The highest dose-response/50 g increase in processed meat consumption at 95 % confident levels was 1·37, 95 % CI (1·22, 1·55) for T2DM, 1·27, 95 % CI (1·09, 1·49) for CHD, 1·17, 95 % CI (1·02, 1·34) for stroke, 1·15, 95 % CI (1·11, 1·19) for all-cause mortality and 1·08, 95 % CI (1·02, 1·14) for heart failure. In addition, red/processed meat intake was associated with several other health-related outcomes. Red and processed meat consumption seems to be more harmful than beneficial to human health in this umbrella review. It is necessary to take the impacts of red/processed meat consumption on non-cancer-related outcomes into consideration when developing new dietary guidelines, which will be of great public health importance. However, more additional randomised controlled trials are warranted to clarify the causality.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.