Systematic review2023Industry fundedOpen access

Funded in part by Dynamical Business & Science Society - DBSS International SAS, Galascreen Laboratories, Research Division at DBSS International SAS, and CESNUTRAL

Nutritional Strategies in the Rehabilitation of Musculoskeletal Injuries in Athletes: A Systematic Integrative Review

Giraldo-Vallejo JE, Cardona-Guzmán MÁ, Rodríguez-Alcivar EJ, Kočí J, Petro JL, Kreider RB, Cannataro R, Bonilla DA

Nutrients · 30 citations

Review labels

Author industry tiesIndustry funded

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Systematic review (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
No health outcome

Who paid for it

Funding
Industry funded
University or hospital
Universidad CES
Company
Dynamical Business & Science Society - DBSS International SAS
Company
Galascreen Laboratories, Research Division at DBSS International SAS, and CESNUTRAL
Authors
At least one author declares a financial tie to industry

Based on 3 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2023-02-05 · Nutrients · vol. 15 · issue 4 · p. 819
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Cited
59 citations · more than 98% of similar papers · 7.4× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
152 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Sports injuries and prevention · Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
Rehabilitation, Medicine, Athletes, Physical therapy, Systematic review, Randomized controlled trial, Sports medicine, MEDLINE, Surgery
MeSH
humans, athletic injuries, exercise, sports, dietary supplements, athletes

8 authors

From CO, CZ, US, IT, ES

  • John E. Giraldo-VallejoClínica CES
  • Miguel Á. Cardona-GuzmánClínica CES
  • Ericka J. Rodríguez-AlcivarClínica CES
  • Jana KočíCharles University
  • Jorge Luis PetroUniversity of Córdoba
  • Richard B. KreiderTexas A&M University

Abstract

It is estimated that three to five million sports injuries occur worldwide each year. The highest incidence is reported during competition periods with mainly affectation of the musculoskeletal tissue. For appropriate nutritional management and correct use of nutritional supplements, it is important to individualize based on clinical effects and know the adaptive response during the rehabilitation phase after a sports injury in athletes. Therefore, the aim of this PRISMA in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport Medicine and Sports Science PERSiST-based systematic integrative review was to perform an update on nutritional strategies during the rehabilitation phase of musculoskeletal injuries in elite athletes. After searching the following databases: PubMed/Medline, Scopus, PEDro, and Google Scholar, a total of 18 studies met the inclusion criteria (Price Index: 66.6%). The risk of bias assessment for randomized controlled trials was performed using the RoB 2.0 tool while review articles were evaluated using the AMSTAR 2.0 items. Based on the main findings of the selected studies, nutritional strategies that benefit the rehabilitation process in injured athletes include balanced energy intake, and a high-protein and carbohydrate-rich diet. Supportive supervision should be provided to avoid low energy availability. The potential of supplementation with collagen, creatine monohydrate, omega-3 (fish oils), and vitamin D requires further research although the effects are quite promising. It is worth noting the lack of clinical research in injured athletes and the higher number of reviews in the last 10 years. After analyzing the current quantitative and non-quantitative evidence, we encourage researchers to conduct further clinical research studies evaluating doses of the discussed nutrients during the rehabilitation process to confirm findings, but also follow international guidelines at the time to review scientific literature.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.