Meta-analysis2023

Sulforaphane exhibits potent renoprotective effects in preclinical models of kidney diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Monteiro EB, Ajackson M, Stockler-Pinto MB, Guebre-Egziabher F, Daleprane JB, Soulage CO

Life sciences · 17 citations

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
Animals
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

Based on 1 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2023-04-05 · Life Sci · vol. 322 · p. 121664
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Cited
24 citations · more than 67% of similar papers · 0.7× the field average
References
63 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress · Advanced Glycation End Products research · Sulfur Compounds in Biology
Keywords
Renal function, Medicine, Creatinine, Urology, Kidney disease, Sulforaphane, Kidney, Internal medicine, Acute kidney injury, Proteinuria, Glomerulosclerosis, Gastroenterology, Endocrinology, Pathology
MeSH
humans, kidney diseases, isothiocyanates, sulfoxides, creatinine, nf-e2-related factor 2, biomarkers, kelch-like ech-associated protein 1

6 authors

From BR, FR

  • Elisa Bernardes MonteiroUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  • Matheus AjacksonUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  • Milena Barcza Stockler‐PintoUniversidade Federal Fluminense
  • Fitsum Guebre‐EgziabherLyon 1 Université; Inserm; Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement; Hospices Civils de Lyon; Laboratoire de recherche en cardiovasculaire, métabolisme, diabétologie et nutrition
  • Júlio Beltrame DalepraneUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  • Christophe Olivier Soulage · correspondingLyon 1 Université; Inserm; Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement; Laboratoire de recherche en cardiovasculaire, métabolisme, diabétologie et nutrition

Abstract

Aims

Sulforaphane (SFN), a naturally occurring isothiocyanate found in cruciferous vegetables, has received extensive attention as a natural activator of the Nrf2/Keap1 cytoprotective pathway. In this review, a meta-analysis and systematic review of the renoprotective effects of SFN were performed in various preclinical models of kidney diseases.

Main methods

The primary outcome was the impact of SFN on renal function biomarkers (uremia, creatininemia, proteinuria or creatinine clearance) and secondary outcomes were kidney lesion histological indices/kidney injury molecular biomarkers. The effects of SFN were evaluated according to the standardized mean differences (SMDs). A random-effects model was applied to estimate the overall summary effect.

Key findings

Twenty-five articles (out of 209 studies) were selected from the literature. SFN administration significantly increased creatinine clearance (SMD +1.88 95 % CI: [1.09; 2.68], P 2 = 0 %) and decreased the plasma creatinine (SMD -1.24, [-1.59; -0.88], P 2 = 36.0 %) and urea (SMD -3.22 [-4.42, -2.01], P 2 = 72.4 %) levels. SFN administration (median dose: 2.5 mg/kg, median duration: 3 weeks) significantly decreased urinary protein excretion (SMD -2.20 [-2.68; -1.73], P 2 = 34.1 %). It further improved two kidney lesion histological indices namely kidney fibrosis (SMD -3.08 [-4.53; -1.63], P 2 = 73.7 %) and glomerulosclerosis (SMD -2.24 [-2.96; -1.53], P 2 = 9.7 %) and decreased kidney injury molecular biomarkers (SMD -1.51 [-2.00; -1.02], P 2 = 0 %).

Significance

These findings provide new insights concerning preclinical strategies for treating kidney disease or kidney failure with SFN supplements and should stimulate interest in clinical evaluations of SFN in patients with kidney disease.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.