The Prospective Associations of Egg Consumption with the Risk of Total Cerebrovascular Disease Morbidity among Chinese Adults
Pan C, Sun X, Song J, Yu C, Guo Y, Wang S, Gao R, Ning F, Pang Z, Chen Z, Li L
Nutrients · 1 citation
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Cohort study (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Clinical events such as disease or death
- Intake measured by
- Food frequency questionnaire
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Independent funding
- Nonprofit
- Wellcome Trust
- Nonprofit
- Cancer Research UK
- Government
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Government
- Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
- Government
- Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention
- Government
- National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China
- Nonprofit
- Kadoorie Charitable Foundation
- Government
- Medical Research Council
- Government
- National Key Research and Development Program of China
- Government
- Qingdao Science and Technology Fund
- Government
- National Key R&D Program of China
- Government
- Qingdao Outstanding Health Professional Development Fund
- Government
- Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology
- Government
- National Key R&D Program of China
- Government
- Qingdao Outstanding Health Professional Development Fund and Qingdao Science and Tech-nology Fund
- Grants
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81390544); Wellcome Trust (212946/Z/18/Z); National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0900500 2016YFC0900501 2016YFC0900504); Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2011BAI09B01); Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00017/1); National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0900500); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81390541); Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2020-2022); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81390540); Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (81390544); Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (81390541); National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0900501); Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2016YFC0900501); Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2016YFC 0900500); Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (21-1-4-rkjk-1-nsh); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81973125，81390540，81390541，81390544); Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2016YFC0900504); Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (81390540); Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2022-2024); Cancer Research UK (29186); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81973125); Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (81973125); National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016 YFC0900504)
Based on 15 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.
Publication
- Published
- 2023-04-07 · Nutrients · vol. 15 · issue 8 · p. 1808
- Publisher
- Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
- Cited
- 3 citations · more than 69% of similar papers · 0.7× the field average
- References
- 61 works
- Access
- Open access (journal) · CC-BY
- Research areas
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Keywords
- Medicine, Confounding, Proportional hazards model, Demography, Biobank, Prospective cohort study, Consumption (sociology), Lower risk, Cohort study, Disease, Hazard ratio, Environmental health, Confidence interval, Internal medicine, Biology, Bioinformatics
- MeSH
- humans, cerebrovascular disorders, morbidity, risk factors, prospective studies, eggs, adult, middle aged, china, female, male, east asian people
11 authors
From CN, GB
- Chi PanQingdao University
- Xiaohui SunQingdao Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention
- Jiahui SongQingdao University
- Canqing YuPeking University
- Canqing YuChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
- Shaojie WangQingdao Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention
Abstract
Background
Studies investigating the relationship between egg consumption and the risk of cerebrovascular disease (CED) have yielded inconsistent results. This study evaluated the association between egg consumption and the risk of CED among Chinese adults.
Methods
Data were obtained from China Kadoorie Biobank, Qingdao. A computerised questionnaire was used to collect information regarding egg consumption frequency. CED events were tracked through linkage with the Disease Surveillance Point System and the new national health insurance databases. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between egg consumption and CED risk controlling for potential confounders.
Results
After a median follow-up of 9.2 years, 865 and 1083 CED events among men and women, respectively, were documented. More than 50% of participants consumed eggs daily with an average age of 52.0 (10.4) years at baseline. No association between egg consumption and CED were identified in the whole cohort and women. However, a 28% lower risk of CED was observed in those who consumed eggs at a higher frequency (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55-0.95) and a significant trend for the association (p for trend = 0.012) in a multivariable model in men.
Conclusion
Higher frequency of egg consumption was associated with a lower risk of total CED events among men but not women in Chinese adults. The beneficial effect on women warrants further investigations.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.