Study2023Open access

Six addiction components of problematic social media use in relation to depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms: a latent profile analysis and network analysis

Peng P, Liao Y

BMC psychiatry · 49 citations

How it was studied

Design
Cross-sectional study (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
STI 2030—Major Projects - "Brain Science and Brain-like Research" Project

Based on 1 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2023-05-08 · BMC Psychiatry · vol. 23 · issue 1 · p. 321
Publisher
BioMed Central
Cited
109 citations · more than 100% of similar papers · 50.2× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
53 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Mental Health via Writing · Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
social media addiction, salience, tolerance, mood modification, relapse, withdrawal, conflict, depression, anxiety, stress, Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, symptom networks
MeSH
humans, depression, anxiety, anxiety disorders, mood disorders, social media

2 authors

From CN

  • Pu PengSir Run Run Shaw Hospital; Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University; Zhejiang University
  • Yanhui Liao · correspondingSir Run Run Shaw Hospital; Zhejiang University

Abstract

Backgrounds

Components of addiction (salience, tolerance, mood modification, relapse, withdrawal, and conflict) is the most cited theoretical framework for problematic social media use (PSMU). However, studies criticized its ability to distinguish problematic users from engaged users. We aimed to assess the association of the six criteria with depression, anxiety, and stress at a symptom level.

Methods

Ten thousand six hundred sixty-eight participants were recruited. Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS) was used to detect six addiction components in PSMU. We applied the depression-anxiety-stress scale to assess mental distress. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted based on BSMAS items. Network analysis (NA) was performed to determine the symptom-symptom interaction of PSMU and mental distress.

Results

(1) Social media users were divided into five subgroups including occasional users (10.6%, n = 1127), regular users (31.0%, n = 3309), high engagement low risk users (10.4%, n = 1115), at-risk users (38.1%, n = 4070), and problematic users (9.8%, n = 1047); (2) PSMU and mental distress varied markedly across subgroups. Problematic users had the most severe PSMU, depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. High engagement users scored high on tolerance and salience criteria of PSMU but displayed little mental distress; (3) NA showed conflict and mood modification was the bridge symptoms across the network, while salience and tolerance exhibited weak association with mental distress.

Conclusions

Salience and tolerance might not distinguish engaged users from problematic users. New frameworks and assessment tools focusing on the negative consequences of social media usage are needed.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.