Meta-analysis2023

Red meat consumption, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Shi W, Huang X, Schooling CM, Zhao JV

European heart journal · 131 citations

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
Health and Medical Research Fund
Grants
Health and Medical Research Fund (16172921)

Based on 1 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2023-05-24 · Eur Heart J · vol. 44 · issue 28 · pp. 2626–2635
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Cited
216 citations · more than 100% of similar papers · 13.7× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
116 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Meat and Animal Product Quality · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Keywords
Medicine, Diabetes mellitus, Meta-analysis, Red meat, Consumption (sociology), MEDLINE, Intensive care medicine, Environmental health, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Pathology
MeSH
humans, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, type 2, diet, risk factors, meat, female, male, stroke, red meat

4 authors

From HK, US

  • Wenming ShiUniversity of Hong Kong
  • Xin Yue HuangUniversity of Hong Kong
  • Catherine Mary SchoolingCity University of New York
  • Jie V. ZhaoUniversity of Hong Kong

Abstract

Aims

Observational studies show inconsistent associations of red meat consumption with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes. Moreover, red meat consumption varies by sex and setting, however, whether the associations vary by sex and setting remains unclear.

Methods and results

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to summarize the evidence concerning the associations of unprocessed and processed red meat consumption with CVD and its subtypes [coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, and heart failure], type two diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and to assess differences by sex and setting (western vs. eastern, categorized based on dietary pattern and geographic region). Two researchers independently screened studies from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published by 30 June 2022. Forty-three observational studies (N = 4 462 810, 61.7% women) for CVD and 27 observational studies (N = 1 760 774, 64.4% women) for diabetes were included. Red meat consumption was positively associated with CVD [hazard ratio (HR) 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05 to 1.16 for unprocessed red meat (per 100 g/day increment); 1.26, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.35 for processed red meat (per 50 g/day increment)], CVD subtypes, T2DM, and GDM. The associations with stroke and T2DM were higher in western settings, with no difference by sex.

Conclusion

Unprocessed and processed red meat consumption are both associated with higher risk of CVD, CVD subtypes, and diabetes, with a stronger association in western settings but no sex difference. Better understanding of the mechanisms is needed to facilitate improving cardiometabolic and planetary health.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.