Aesthetic and physiological effects of naturalistic multimodal music listening
Czepiel A, Fink LK, Seibert C, Scharinger M, Kotz SA
Cognition · 11 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Controlled clinical trial (classified by our AI screen)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- No health outcome
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2023-07-22 · Cognition · vol. 239 · p. 105537
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Cited
- 22 citations · more than 95% of similar papers · 4.3× the field average
- Impact
- Top 10% most cited in its field
- References
- 133 works
- Access
- Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY
- Research areas
- Multisensory perception and integration · Neuroscience and Music Perception · Color perception and design
- Keywords
- Psychology, Facial muscles, Arousal, Rhythm, Syllable, Audiology, Facial expression, Sensory system, Cognitive psychology, Neuroscience, Communication
- MeSH
- sympathetic nervous system, humans, auditory perception, arousal, movement, music
5 authors
From NL, DE
- Anna M. Czepiel · correspondingMaastricht University; Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics
- Lauren FinkMax Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics; Max Planck Institute for Brain Research
- Christoph SeibertHochschule für Musik Karlsruhe
- Mathias ScharingerPhilipps University of Marburg; Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics
- Sonja A. KotzMaastricht University; Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Abstract
Compared to audio only (AO) conditions, audiovisual (AV) information can enhance the aesthetic experience of a music performance. However, such beneficial multimodal effects have yet to be studied in naturalistic music performance settings. Further, peripheral physiological correlates of aesthetic experiences are not well-understood. Here, participants were invited to a concert hall for piano performances of Bach, Messiaen, and Beethoven, which were presented in two conditions: AV and AO. They rated their aesthetic experience (AE) after each piece (Experiment 1 and 2), while peripheral signals (cardiorespiratory measures, skin conductance, and facial muscle activity) were continuously measured (Experiment 2). Factor scores of AE were significantly higher in the AV condition in both experiments. LF/HF ratio, a heart rhythm that represents activation of the sympathetic nervous system, was higher in the AO condition, suggesting increased arousal, likely caused by less predictable sound onsets in the AO condition. We present partial evidence that breathing was faster and facial muscle activity was higher in the AV condition, suggesting that observing a performer's movements likely enhances motor mimicry in these more voluntary peripheral measures. Further, zygomaticus ('smiling') muscle activity was a significant predictor of AE. Thus, we suggest physiological measures are related to AE, but at different levels: the more involuntary measures (i.e., heart rhythms) may reflect more sensory aspects, while the more voluntary measures (i.e., muscular control of breathing and facial responses) may reflect the liking aspect of an AE. In summary, we replicate and extend previous findings that AV information enhances AE in a naturalistic music performance setting. We further show that a combination of self-report and peripheral measures benefit a meaningful assessment of AE in naturalistic music performance settings.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.