Meta-analysis2023Open access

Time-restricted eating with calorie restriction on weight loss and cardiometabolic risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sun JC, Tan ZT, He CJ, Hu HL, Zhai CL, Qian G

European journal of clinical nutrition · 35 citations

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Government
Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province

Based on 2 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2023-07-24 · Eur J Clin Nutr · vol. 77 · issue 11 · pp. 1014–1025
Publisher
Springer Nature
Cited
49 citations · more than 91% of similar papers · 2.4× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
59 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Dietary Effects on Health · Diet and metabolism studies · Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
Meta-analysis, Calorie, Calorie restriction, Medicine, Weight loss, Obesity, Body mass index, Systematic review, MEDLINE, Environmental health, Internal medicine, Biology
MeSH
humans, cardiovascular diseases, body weight, weight loss, caloric restriction, blood pressure

6 authors

From CN

  • Jing-Chao SunJiaxing University
  • Zhen-Tao TanZhejiang Chinese Medical University; Jiaxing University
  • Chao‐Jie HeJiaxing University
  • Huilin HuJiaxing University
  • Changlin ZhaiJiaxing University
  • Gang Qian · correspondingJiaxing University; First Hospital of Jiaxing

Abstract

The effect of time-restricted eating (TRE) has been summarized in previous studies, but its benefits in combination with calorie restriction (CR) still need to be determined. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TRE with CR on weight loss and cardiometabolic risk. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and gray literature databases were searched from inception to October 18, 2022, for potential randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Body weight and other cardiometabolic risk factors were described as weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Eight RCTs involving 579 participants were enrolled in the present analysis. The pooled results showed that TRE with CR reduced the body weight, fat mass, and waist circumference significantly (WMD: -1.40, 95% CI: -1.81 to -1.00, and I2: 0%; WMD: -0.73, 95% CI: -1.39 to -0.07, and I2: 0%; WMD: -1.87, 95% CI: -3.47 to -0.26, and I2: 67.25%, respectively). However, compared with CR alone, TRE plus CR exhibited no significant benefit on the blood pressure, glucose profile, and lipid profile. Subgroup analysis suggested that early TRE is more effective in weight loss (WMD: -1.42, 95% CI: -1.84 to -1.01, and I2: 0%) and improving fat mass (WMD: -1.06, 95% CI: -1.91 to -0.22, and I2: 0%) than delayed or broader TRE when combined with CR. Although the combination of TRE and CR can effectively decrease body weight, fat mass, and waist circumference, the long-term effects, particularly those on cardiometabolic risk in participants with chronic cardiovascular disease and diabetes, remain to be explored.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.