Time-restricted eating with calorie restriction on weight loss and cardiometabolic risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Sun JC, Tan ZT, He CJ, Hu HL, Zhai CL, Qian G
European journal of clinical nutrition · 35 citations
How it was studied
- Design
- Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Health markers and function
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Independent funding
- Government
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Government
- Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
Based on 2 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.
Publication
- Published
- 2023-07-24 · Eur J Clin Nutr · vol. 77 · issue 11 · pp. 1014–1025
- Publisher
- Springer Nature
- Cited
- 49 citations · more than 91% of similar papers · 2.4× the field average
- Impact
- Top 10% most cited in its field
- References
- 59 works
- Access
- Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY
- Research areas
- Dietary Effects on Health · Diet and metabolism studies · Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Keywords
- Meta-analysis, Calorie, Calorie restriction, Medicine, Weight loss, Obesity, Body mass index, Systematic review, MEDLINE, Environmental health, Internal medicine, Biology
- MeSH
- humans, cardiovascular diseases, body weight, weight loss, caloric restriction, blood pressure
6 authors
From CN
- Jing-Chao SunJiaxing University
- Zhen-Tao TanZhejiang Chinese Medical University; Jiaxing University
- Chao‐Jie HeJiaxing University
- Huilin HuJiaxing University
- Changlin ZhaiJiaxing University
- Gang Qian · correspondingJiaxing University; First Hospital of Jiaxing
Abstract
The effect of time-restricted eating (TRE) has been summarized in previous studies, but its benefits in combination with calorie restriction (CR) still need to be determined. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TRE with CR on weight loss and cardiometabolic risk. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and gray literature databases were searched from inception to October 18, 2022, for potential randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Body weight and other cardiometabolic risk factors were described as weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Eight RCTs involving 579 participants were enrolled in the present analysis. The pooled results showed that TRE with CR reduced the body weight, fat mass, and waist circumference significantly (WMD: -1.40, 95% CI: -1.81 to -1.00, and I2: 0%; WMD: -0.73, 95% CI: -1.39 to -0.07, and I2: 0%; WMD: -1.87, 95% CI: -3.47 to -0.26, and I2: 67.25%, respectively). However, compared with CR alone, TRE plus CR exhibited no significant benefit on the blood pressure, glucose profile, and lipid profile. Subgroup analysis suggested that early TRE is more effective in weight loss (WMD: -1.42, 95% CI: -1.84 to -1.01, and I2: 0%) and improving fat mass (WMD: -1.06, 95% CI: -1.91 to -0.22, and I2: 0%) than delayed or broader TRE when combined with CR. Although the combination of TRE and CR can effectively decrease body weight, fat mass, and waist circumference, the long-term effects, particularly those on cardiometabolic risk in participants with chronic cardiovascular disease and diabetes, remain to be explored.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.