Randomized controlled trial2023Open access

The Effects of Creatine Monohydrate Loading on Exercise Recovery in Active Women throughout the Menstrual Cycle

Gordon AN, Moore SR, Patterson ND, Hostetter ME, Cabre HE, Hirsch KR, Hackney AC, Smith-Ryan AE

Nutrients · 15 citations

Review labels

Author industry ties

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Government
NIDDK NIH HHS
Authors
At least one author declares a financial tie to industry
Grants
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32‐DK064584)

Based on 2 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2023-08-13 · Nutrients · vol. 15 · issue 16 · p. 3567
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Cited
21 citations · more than 91% of similar papers · 2.7× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
44 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Sports Performance and Training · Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
Sprint, Creatine, Creatine Monohydrate, Medicine, Follicular phase, Anaerobic exercise, Internal medicine, Luteal phase, Endocrinology, Menstrual cycle, Hormone, Placebo, Physical therapy
MeSH
humans, creatine, progesterone, cross-over studies, menstrual cycle, bicycling, dietary supplements, adolescent, adult, female, young adult

8 authors

From US

  • Amanda N. GordonUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Sam R. MooreUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Noah D. PattersonUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Maggie E. HostetterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Hannah E. CabreUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Katie R. HirschUniversity of South Carolina

Abstract

Creatine supplementation improves anaerobic performance and recovery; however, to date, these outcomes have not been well explored in females. This study evaluated the effect of creatine monohydrate loading on exercise recovery, measured by heart rate variability (HRV) and repeated sprint performance, in women across the menstrual cycle. In this randomized, double-blind, cross-over study, 39 women (mean ± standard deviation: age: 24.6 ± 5.9 years, height: 172.5 ± 42.3 cm, weight: 65.1 ± 8.1 kg, BF: 27.4 ± 5.8%) were randomized to a creatine monohydrate (n = 19; 20 g per day in 4 × 5 g doses) or non-caloric PL group (n = 20). HRV was measured at rest and after participants completed a repeated sprint cycling test (10 × 6 s maximal sprints). Measurements were conducted before and after supplementation in the follicular/low hormone and luteal/high hormone phases. Creatine monohydrate supplementation did not influence HRV values, as no significant differences were seen in HRV values at rest or postexercise. For repeated sprint outcomes, there was a significant phase × supplement interaction (p = 0.048) for fatigue index, with the greatest improvement seen in high hormone in the creatine monohydrate group (-5.8 ± 19.0%) compared to changes in the PL group (0.1 ± 8.1%). Sprint performance and recovery were reduced by the high hormone for both groups. Though not statistically significant, the data suggests that creatine monohydrate could help counteract performance decrements caused by the high hormone. This data can help inform creatine monohydrate loading strategies for females, demonstrating potential benefits in the high hormone phase.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.