Randomized controlled trial2023

Active recovery vs hot- or cold-water immersion for repeated sprint ability after a strenuous exercise training session in elite skaters

Solsona R, Méline T, Borrani F, Deriaz R, Lacroix J, Normand-Gravier T, Candau R, Racinais S, Sanchez AM

Journal of sports sciences · 10 citations

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
the French “MinisteϬre des sports” and the “Institut National du Sport, de l’Expertise et de la Performance”

Based on 1 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2023-06-03 · J Sports Sci · vol. 41 · issue 11 · pp. 1126–1135
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Cited
14 citations · more than 91% of similar papers · 2.9× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
61 works
Access
Open access (repository copy) · CC-BY-NC-ND
Research areas
Sports Performance and Training · Exercise and Physiological Responses · Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
Sprint, Rating of perceived exertion, Cycling, Physical therapy, Perceived exertion, Medicine, Time trial, Psychology, Heart rate, Blood pressure, Internal medicine
MeSH
humans, fatigue, water, exercise, immersion, male, cold temperature

9 authors

From FR, CH, QA

  • Robert SolsonaUniversité de Perpignan
  • Thibaut MélineUniversité de Perpignan; Université de Montpellier; Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement; Dynamique du Muscle et Métabolisme
  • Fabio BorraniUniversity of Lausanne
  • Roméo DeriazUniversité de Perpignan
  • Jérôme J. LacroixUniversité de Perpignan; Centre Hospitalier de Perpignan
  • Tom Normand‐GravierUniversité de Perpignan; Université de Montpellier; Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement; Dynamique du Muscle et Métabolisme

Abstract

This study compared the acute effects of three recovery methods: active recovery (AR), hot- and cold-water immersion (HWI and CWI, respectively), used between two training sessions in elite athletes. Twelve national-team skaters (7 males, 5 females) completed three trials according to a randomized cross-over study. Fifteen minutes after an exhaustive ice-skating training session, participants underwent 20 min of HWI (41.1 ± 0.5°C), 15 min of CWI (12.1 ± 0.7°C) or 15 min of active recovery (AR). After 1 h 30 min of the first exercise, they performed a repeated-sprint cycling session. Average power output was slightly but significantly higher for AR (767 ± 179 W) and HWI (766 ± 170 W) compared to CWI (738 ± 156 W) (p = 0.026, d = 0.18). No statistical difference was observed between the conditions for both lactatemia and rating of perceived exertion. Furthermore, no significant effect of recovery was observed on the fatigue index calculated from the repeated sprint cycling exercises (p > 0.05). Finally, a positive correlation was found between the average muscle temperature measured during the recoveries and the maximal power output obtained during cycling exercises. In conclusion, the use of CWI in between high-intensity training sessions could slightly impair the performance outcomes compared to AR and HWI. However, studies with larger samples are needed to confirm these results, especially in less trained athletes.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.