Meta-analysis2024Open access

High intake of ultra-processed food is associated with dementia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Henney AE, Gillespie CS, Alam U, Hydes TJ, Mackay CE, Cuthbertson DJ

Journal of neurology · 48 citations

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding

Based on full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2023-10-13 · J Neurol · vol. 271 · issue 1 · pp. 198–210
Publisher
Springer Science+Business Media
Cited
61 citations · more than 96% of similar papers · 3.9× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
52 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease · Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
Dementia, Medicine, Observational study, Meta-analysis, Confounding, Confidence interval, Gerontology, Environmental health, Disease, Internal medicine
MeSH
humans, dementia, diet, public health, adult, observational studies as topic, food, processed

6 authors

From GB

  • Alex E. Henney · correspondingUniversity of Liverpool; Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Aintree University Hospital; Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Conor Scott GillespieUniversity of Cambridge
  • Uazman AlamUniversity of Liverpool; Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Theresa HydesUniversity of Liverpool; Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Clare E. MackayUniversity of Oxford
  • Daniel James CuthbertsonUniversity of Liverpool; Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Abstract

Background and aims

Poor cardiometabolic health is associated with dementia. Considering previous meta-analyses have confirmed associations between ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and cardiometabolic disease, we were interested in the contribution of UPF consumption to the risk of developing dementia.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all records registered on Ovid Medline and Web of Science from inception until December 2022 [PROSPERO (CRD42023388363)]. Studies that assessed UPF consumption in adults, determined according to NOVA, and that reported dementia (Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia and mild cognitive impairment) determined by clearly stated diagnostic criteria (including formal assessment of dementia or use of diagnostic codes) were included. The association between UPF consumption and dementia was assessed using random-effects meta-analysis, controlling for confounding variables. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and evidence credibility evaluated using the NutriGrade system.

Results

Seven thousand ten records were screened, and 122 records underwent full text review. From these, 10 observational (8 longitudinal) studies, analysing 867,316 individuals, were included. Included studies adjusted for age, socioeconomic status and co-morbidity, alongside other confounders. High (vs. low) intake of UPF was associated with increased risk of dementia (pooled relative risk 1.44 (95% confidence interval 1.09-1.90) (p = 0.02)) (I2 = 97.0%), although moderate (vs. low) intake of UPF was not (1.12 (0.96-1.31) (0.13)) (85.0%). Funnel plots demonstrate low risk of publication bias.

Conclusion

High UPF consumption is associated with dementia. Public health measures to reduce overconsumption of UPFs are imperative to reduce the burden of dementia.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.