Meta-analysis2023Open access

The current and future costs of colorectal cancer attributable to red and processed meat consumption in Brazil

Rezende LFM, Rezende LFM, Malhão TA, da Silva Barbosa R, Schilithz AOC, da Silva RCF, Moreira LGM, Ferrari G, Machado PAN, Diogenes MEL

BMC health services research · 5 citations

Review labels

Lumps processed with unprocessed meat

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Nonprofit
Climate and Land Use Alliance

Based on 1 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2023-10-31 · BMC Health Serv Res · vol. 23 · issue 1 · p. 1182
Publisher
BioMed Central
Cited
6 citations · more than 70% of similar papers · 0.7× the field average
References
26 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
Red meat, Medicine, Colorectal cancer, Environmental health, Consumption (sociology), Psychological intervention, Public health, Attributable risk, Health care, Cancer prevention, Cancer, Population, Internal medicine, Economic growth, Economics
MeSH
humans, colorectal neoplasms, diet, risk assessment, risk factors, meat, adult, brazil

9 authors

From BR, CL

  • Leandro do Carmo RezendeUniversidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Thainá Alves MalhãoInstituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA
  • Rafael da Silva BarbosaUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo
  • Arthur Orlando Corrêa SchilithzInstituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA
  • Ronaldo Corrêa Ferreira da SilvaInstituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA
  • Luciana Grucci Maya MoreiraInstituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA

Abstract

Background

Compelling evidence supports the association between red and processed meat consumption and increased risk of colorectal cancer. Herein, we estimated the current (2018) and future (2030) federal direct healthcare costs of colorectal cancer in the Brazilian Unified Health System attributable to red and processed meat consumption. Considering reduced red and processed meat consumption, we also projected attributable costs of colorectal cancer in 2040.

Methods

We retrieved information on red and processed meat consumption from two nationally representative dietary surveys, the Household Budget Survey 2008-2009 and 2017-2018; relative risks for colorectal cancer from a meta-analysis; direct healthcare costs of inpatient and outpatient procedures in adults ≥ 30 years with colorectal cancer (C18-C20) from 2008-2019 by sex.

Results

Attributable costs of colorectal cancer were calculated via comparative risk assessment, assuming a 10-year lag. In 2018, US$ 20.6 million (8.4%) of direct healthcare costs of colorectal cancer were attributable to red and processed meat consumption. In 2030, attributable costs will increase to US$ 86.6 million (19.3%). Counterfactual scenarios of reducing red and processed meat consumption in 2030 suggested that US$ 2.2 to 11.9 million and US$ 13 to 74 million could be saved in 2040, respectively.

Conclusion

Red and processed meat consumption has an escalating economic impact on the Brazilian Unified Health System. Our findings support interventions and policies focused on primary prevention and cancer.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.