Systematic review2024Open access

Effect of blueberry intervention on endothelial function: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Deng B, Lei Y, Zhou R, Ruan T, Lu W, Ying J, Yue Y, Mu D

Frontiers in physiology · 9 citations

How it was studied

Design
Systematic review (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Grants
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81971428); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81971433); National Natural Science Foundation of China (82371717); National Natural Science Foundation of China (82201905); National Natural Science Foundation of China (2021YFC2701700); National Natural Science Foundation of China (82271749)

Based on 1 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2024-06-03 · Front Physiol · vol. 15 · p. 1368892
Publisher
Frontiers Media
Cited
11 citations · more than 80% of similar papers · 1.5× the field average
References
45 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies · Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention · Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
Medicine, Blood pressure, Internal medicine, Endothelial dysfunction, Meta-analysis, Confidence interval, Population, Cochrane Library, Reactive hyperemia, Cardiology, Endocrinology, Blood flow

8 authors

From CN

  • Bixin DengSichuan University; West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University
  • Yupeng LeiSichuan University; West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University
  • Ruixi ZhouSichuan University; West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University
  • Tiechao RuanSichuan University; West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University
  • Wenting LuSichuan University; West China Hospital of Sichuan University
  • Junjie YingSichuan University

Abstract

Introduction: Endothelial dysfunction indicates blood vessel injury and is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Blueberry has been approved for its benefits on human health, especially on cardiovascular function. However, its effect on endothelial function remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the impact of blueberries on endothelial function in adults. Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, 16 studies were included in the systematic review, and 11 were used for the meta-analysis. Data associated with endothelial function were extracted and pooled as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Blueberry consumption significantly improved flow-mediated dilation (FMD) by 1.50% (95% CI: 0.81, 2.20; I2 = 87%) and reactive hyperemia index (RHI) by 0.26 (95% CI: 0.09, 0.42; I2 = 72%). A significant decrease in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was also observed (MD: -2.20 mm Hg; 95% CI: -4.13, -0.27; I2 = 11%). Subgroup analysis indicated a significant decrease in blood pressure (Systolic blood pressure [SBP]: -3.92 mmHg; 95% CI: -6.88, -0.97; I2 = 20% and DBP: -2.20 mmHg; 95% CI: -4.13, -0.27; I2 = 11%) in the smoking population. However, SBP levels (MD: -1.43 mm Hg; 95% CI: -3.11, 0.26; I2 = 20%) and lipid status (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C]: 0.06; 95% CI: -0.04, 0.16; I2 = 77%; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C]: 0.05; 95% CI: -0.14, 0.24; I2 = 0%) did not significantly improve. Conclusion: Blueberry intervention improved endothelial function and DBP. Subgroup analysis revealed a notable improvement in blood pressure among the smoking population. However, no significant effects were observed on SBP, HDL-C, and LDL-C levels. Future research should delve into the mechanisms of endothelial improvement and verify blood pressure reduction in specific subpopulations through large-scale trials. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, Identifier CRD42023491277.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.