Meta-analysis2024Open access

Broccoli Consumption and Risk of Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Baladia E, Moñino M, Pleguezuelos E, Russolillo G, Garnacho-Castaño MV

Nutrients · 8 citations

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding

Based on full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2024-05-23 · Nutrients · vol. 16 · issue 11 · p. 1583
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Cited
12 citations · more than 86% of similar papers · 2.2× the field average
References
104 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Morinda citrifolia extract uses · Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress · Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents
Keywords
Meta-analysis, Medicine, Cochrane Library, Publication bias, Observational study, Subgroup analysis, Cohort study, Systematic review, MEDLINE, Relative risk, Cancer, Internal medicine, Study heterogeneity, Oncology, Confidence interval, Biology
MeSH
humans, brassica, neoplasms, diet, risk factors, case-control studies, female, observational studies as topic

5 authors

From ES

  • Eduard Baladía
  • Manuel MoñinoInstituto de Salud Carlos III; Spanish Biomedical Research Centre in Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition
  • Eulogio PleguezuelosHospital de Mataró
  • Giuseppe Russolillo
  • Manuel Vicente Garnacho‐Castaño · correspondingValencian International University; Universitat de Barcelona

Abstract

Background

The scientific literature has reported an inverse association between broccoli consumption and the risk of suffering from several types of cancer; however, the results were not entirely consistent across studies. A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies were conducted to determine the association between broccoli consumption and cancer risk with the aim of clarifying the beneficial biological effects of broccoli consumption on cancer.

Methods

PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), and Epistemonikos databases were searched to identify all published papers that evaluate the impact of broccoli consumption on the risk of cancer. Citation chasing of included studies was conducted as a complementary search strategy. The risk of bias in individual studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects model meta-analysis was employed to quantitatively synthesize results, with the I2 index used to assess heterogeneity.

Results

Twenty-three case-control studies (n = 12,929 cases and 18,363 controls; n = 31,292 individuals) and 12 cohort studies (n = 699,482 individuals) were included in the meta-analysis. The results suggest an inverse association between broccoli consumption and the risk of cancer both in case-control studies (OR: 0.64, 95% CI from 0.58 to 0.70, p p = 0.072, I2 = 30.49%-moderate heterogeneity; τ2 = 0.016) and cohort studies (RR: 0.89, 95% CI from 0.82 to 0.96, p = 0.003; Q = 13.51, p = 0.333, I2 = 11.21%-low heterogeneity; τ2 = 0.002). Subgroup analysis suggested a potential benefit of broccoli consumption in site-specific cancers only in case-control studies.

Conclusions

In summary, the findings indicate that individuals suffering from some type of cancer consumed less broccoli, suggesting a protective biological effect of broccoli on cancer. More studies, especially cohort studies, are necessary to clarify the possible beneficial effect of broccoli on several types of cancer.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.