Systematic review2025

Olive Oil Consumption, Risk Factors, and Diseases: An Umbrella Review

Fraga SRO, Zago L, Curioni CC

Nutrition reviews · 3 citations

How it was studied

Design
Systematic review (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Government
CAPES
Grants
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (31004016052P7)

Based on 2 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2024-07-13 · Nutr Rev · vol. 83 · issue 3 · pp. e1311–e1328
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Cited
6 citations · more than 69% of similar papers · 1.0× the field average
References
31 works
Access
Paywalled
Research areas
Edible Oils Quality and Analysis · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Nuts composition and effects
Keywords
Medicine, Observational study, Environmental health, Systematic review, Randomized controlled trial, Context (archaeology), Type 2 diabetes, MEDLINE, Diabetes mellitus, Internal medicine, Biology, Endocrinology
MeSH
humans, neoplasms, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, type 2, diet, risk factors, randomized controlled trials as topic, olive oil, observational studies as topic, systematic reviews as topic

3 authors

From BR

  • Shyrlei R O FragaUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  • Lília ZagoUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  • Cíntia Chaves Curioni · correspondingUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

Abstract

Context

Olive oil is a vegetable oil that provides health benefits, including a reduction in free radicals and total cholesterol and prevention of chronic diseases. The escalating incidence of chronic diseases presents a substantial challenge to public health, prompting numerous studies to assess these health-related effects. Despite several systematic reviews and meta-analyses summarizing the association between olive oil consumption and specific health outcomes, there is no summary of the accumulated evidence from these reviews.

Objective

This umbrella review summarizes the evidence on olive oil consumption or intervention in adults and its association with multiple risk factors and diseases.

Data sources

We retrieved systematic reviews of randomized trials or observational studies on oral interventions or the consumption of olive oil. The systematic search encompassed databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, and CENTRAL from inception to February 6, 2023.

Data extraction

Two independent reviewers conducted data extraction and assessed methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool.

Data analysis

Overall, 17 systematic reviews of randomized trials and observational studies, covering outcomes such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, type 2 diabetes, glucose metabolism, inflammatory and oxidative markers, and all-cause mortality, were included. The evidence suggests a beneficial association between olive oil consumption and cardiovascular diseases, cancer, type 2 diabetes, and all-cause mortality. However, the evidence was less definitive for inflammatory markers, oxidative stress, glucose metabolism, and blood lipid outcomes. Several meta-analyses revealed high heterogeneity and wide confidence intervals, along with a limited number of randomized clinical trials.

Conclusion

Given the high heterogeneity and low quality of evidence, further studies involving randomized trials are imperative. Prioritizing an in-depth analysis of specific olive oil components and using a control group with distinct characteristics and different effects is strongly recommended.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022357290.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.