Study2024Open access

Examining the Prevalence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries on Artificial Turf Surfaces Compared to Natural Grass Surfaces in Athletes: A Scoping Review

Kushner JN, Swickley T, Bandi R, Lian J, Knecht MK, Sacca L

Cureus · 1 citation

How it was studied

Design
Systematic review (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding

Based on full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2024-07-03 · Cureus · vol. 16 · issue 7 · p. e63770
Publisher
Cureus, Inc.
Cited
1 citation · more than 61% of similar papers · 0.4× the field average
References
18 works
Access
Open access (free to publish) · CC-BY
Research areas
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques · Sports injuries and prevention · Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Keywords
Anterior cruciate ligament, Medicine, Athletes, ACL injury, Football, Physical therapy, Confidence interval, Cohort study, Meta-analysis, Injury prevention, Poison control, Surgery, Emergency medicine, Internal medicine

6 authors

From US

  • Jared N. Kushner · correspondingMontefiore Medical Center; Florida Atlantic University
  • Tomas SwickleyFlorida Atlantic University
  • Rishiraj BandiFlorida Atlantic University
  • Jayson LianMontefiore Medical Center; Florida Atlantic University
  • Michelle Keba KnechtFlorida Atlantic University
  • Lea SaccaFlorida Atlantic University

Abstract

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is commonly injured in sports such as American football and soccer. It is currently unknown if ACL injuries are more prevalent on natural grass or artificial turf fields. The purpose of this scoping review is to analyze research studies evaluating the effect of the playing surface on the prevalence of ACL injuries. We hypothesize that athletes face a greater risk of suffering ACL injuries while playing on artificial turf compared to natural grass. Our team conducted a comprehensive literature review by screening three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane) that comprised a wide range of peer-reviewed articles on ACL injuries suffered on natural grass and artificial turf surfaces. Inclusion criteria consisted of epidemiological and cohort studies published after 1990 that were written in English and focused on athletes ranging in skill level from youth to professional. Exclusion criteria consisted of biomechanical studies, review articles, and papers that focused on injuries of structures other than the ACL. Bias was assessed with the MINORS criteria. Results were presented by injury rates, calculated ratios, and confidence intervals. The final analysis included nine papers published in peer-reviewed journals. Three of nine papers found that ACL injuries are more likely to occur on artificial turf than on natural grass. Three papers found that there is no difference in the prevalence of ACL injuries between surfaces and one paper stated that ACL injuries are more likely on natural grass than artificial turf. Two papers did not report confidence intervals for ratios comparing injury rates between playing surfaces. There is no consensus in the current literature regarding the prevalence of ACL injuries on artificial turf versus natural grass surfaces. The primary limitation of this study was that the papers used a variety of methods to compare rates of ACL injuries on artificial and natural surfaces, making comparisons between the nine papers difficult.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.