Systematic review2024

Ultra-processed foods, allergy outcomes and underlying mechanisms in children: An EAACI task force report

Berni Canani R, Carucci L, Coppola S, D'Auria E, O'Mahony L, Roth-Walter F, Vassilopolou E, Agostoni C, Agache I, Akdis C, De Giovanni Di Santa Severina F, Faketea G, Greenhawt M, Hoffman K, Hufnagel K, Meyer R, Milani GP, Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Nwaru B, Padua I, Paparo L, Diego P, Reese I, Roduit C, Smith PK, Santos A, Untersmayr E, Vlieg-Boerstra B, Venter C

Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 38 citations

How it was studied

Design
Systematic review (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Nonprofit
European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Based on 1 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2024-09-01 · Pediatr Allergy Immunol · vol. 35 · issue 9 · p. e14231
Publisher
Wiley
Cited
51 citations · more than 100% of similar papers · 19.5× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
104 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Keywords
Medicine, Allergy, Asthma, Food allergy, Hygiene hypothesis, Environmental health, Immunology, Pediatrics
MeSH
humans, asthma, food hypersensitivity, food handling, child, child, preschool, advisory committees, fast foods, rhinitis, allergic, gastrointestinal microbiome, food, processed

29 authors

From IT, IE, AT, GR, RO, CH, US, GB, BE, PL, SE, PT, AU, NL

  • Roberto Berni Canani · correspondingCEINGE Biotecnologie Avanzate Franco Salvatore (Italy); University of Naples Federico II
  • Laura R. CarucciCEINGE Biotecnologie Avanzate Franco Salvatore (Italy); University of Naples Federico II
  • Serena CoppolaCEINGE Biotecnologie Avanzate Franco Salvatore (Italy); University of Naples Federico II
  • Enza D’AuriaUniversity of Milan
  • Liam O’MahonyUniversity College Cork; APC Microbiome Institute
  • Franziska Roth‐WalterUniversity of Vienna; University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna; Medical University of Vienna

Abstract

Background

Consumption of ultra-processed foods [UPFs] may be associated with negative health outcomes. Limited data exist regarding the potential role of UPFs in the occurrence of allergic diseases. The underlying mechanisms underpinning any such associations are also poorly elucidated.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and narrative evidence synthesis of the available literature to assess associations between UPF consumption and pediatric allergy outcomes (n = 26 papers), including data on the association seen with the gut microbiome (n = 16 papers) or immune system (n = 3 papers) structure and function following PRISMA guidelines.

Results

Dietary exposure to fructose, carbonated soft drinks, and sugar intake was associated with an increased risk of asthma, allergic rhinitis, and food allergies in children. Commercial baby food intake was associated with childhood food allergy. Childhood intake of fructose, fruit juices, sugar-sweetened beverages, high carbohydrate UPFs, monosodium glutamate, UPFs, and advanced glycated end-products (AGEs) was associated with the occurrence of allergic diseases. Exposure to UPFs and common ingredients in UPFs seem to be associated with increased occurrence of allergic diseases such as asthma, wheezing, food allergies, atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinitis, in many, but not all studies.

Conclusion

More preclinical and clinical studies are required to better define the link between UPF consumption and the risk of allergies and asthma. These observational studies ideally require supporting data with clearly defined UPF consumption, validated dietary measures, and mechanistic assessments to definitively link UPFs with the risk of allergies and asthma.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.