Propensity score matched cohort study on magnesium supplementation and mortality in critically ill patients with HFpEF
Song L, Ying J, Li M, Ying L, Zhao C
Scientific reports · 4 citations
How it was studied
- Design
- Cohort study (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Clinical events such as disease or death
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Independent funding
- Government
- Yiwu Science and Technology Bureau’s Science and Technology Program
- Government
- Yiwu Science and Technology Bureau's Science and Technology Program
Based on 2 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.
Publication
- Published
- 2025-01-14 · Sci Rep · vol. 15 · issue 1 · p. 1944
- Publisher
- Nature Portfolio
- Cited
- 5 citations · more than 87% of similar papers · 2.5× the field average
- References
- 39 works
- Access
- Open access (journal) · CC-BY-NC-ND
- Research areas
- Magnesium in Health and Disease · Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments · Potassium and Related Disorders
- Keywords
- Medicine, Hazard ratio, Propensity score matching, Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, Heart failure, Internal medicine, Confidence interval, Proportional hazards model, Cohort, Ejection fraction, Cardiology, Mortality rate, Cohort study, Magnesium
- MeSH
- humans, critical illness, magnesium, stroke volume, cohort studies, dietary supplements, aged, aged, 80 and over, middle aged, female, male, heart failure, propensity score
5 authors
From CN
- Lijun Song · correspondingZhejiang International Studies University; Zhejiang University
- Jianjun YingYiwu Science and Technology Research Institute
- Man LiZhejiang University
- Ying LanSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
- Chen‐Liang ZhaoHeyou Hospital
Abstract
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) emerges as a singular subclass of heart failure, bereft of specific therapeutic options. Magnesium, an indispensable trace element, is essential to the preservation of cardiac integrity. However, the association between magnesium supplementation and mortality in HFpEF patients remains unclear. This study extracted HFpEF patient data from the MIMIC-IV database between 2008 and 2019. Propensity score matching was conducted to ensure that patients receiving magnesium supplementation (including magnesium sulfate and magnesium oxide) were balanced with those not receiving it in terms of baseline characteristics. The primary analysis focused on the 28-day all-cause mortality rate, with secondary endpoints encompassing ICU and one-year mortality rates, along with the duration of hospitalization. After matching, the study's final cohort balanced at 1970 patients, with 985 patients per group. The results showed that magnesium intake significantly contributed to a decrease in the 28-day all-cause mortality rate (hazard ratio [HR], 0.682; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.539-0.863), particularly in subgroups such as older patients (HR, 0.65; 95% CI 0.52-0.81), females (HR, 0.55; 95% CI 0.41-0.73), and those with hypertension (HR, 0.62; 95% CI 0.48-0.79) or without diabetes (HR, 0.54; 95% CI 0.41-0.71). Although magnesium treatment improved both ICU and one-year mortality rates, it concurrently resulted in extended ICU and hospital stays. Mediation analysis indicated that blood urea nitrogen partially mediated the association between magnesium intake and mortality, accounting for approximately 22.73% of the observed effect. Magnesium supplementation has illustrated a significant potential for mitigating the mortality rate in the HFpEF patient, particularly among the elderly, female, and individuals with hypertension. Therefore, magnesium supplementation stands as a potentially valuable supplementary treatment modality for patients with HFpEF. Further comprehensive research is warranted to explore its effects more deeply.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY-NC-ND).
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.