Meta-analysis2025Open access

The effect of magnesium supplementation on serum concentration of lipid profile: an updated systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials

Hariri M, Sohrabi M, Gholami A

Nutrition journal · 4 citations

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
University or hospital
Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences

Based on 1 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2025-02-04 · Nutr J · vol. 24 · issue 1 · p. 24
Publisher
BioMed Central
Cited
8 citations · more than 86% of similar papers · 2.1× the field average
References
77 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY-NC-ND
Research areas
Magnesium in Health and Disease · Therapeutic Uses of Natural Elements · Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
Medicine, Clinical nutrition, Meta-analysis, Randomized controlled trial, Lipidology, Internal medicine, Magnesium, Clinical chemistry, Lipid profile, Pharmacology, Cholesterol
MeSH
humans, magnesium, cholesterol, lipids, triglycerides, dose-response relationship, drug, dietary supplements, adult, aged, middle aged, female, male, cholesterol, ldl, cholesterol, hdl, randomized controlled trials as topic

3 authors

From IR

  • Mitra HaririUniversity of Neyshabur; Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center; Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences
  • Masoudreza SohrabiFiroozgar General Hospital
  • Ali Gholami · correspondingUniversity of Neyshabur; Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center; Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Background

Some evidence suggests magnesium might reduce serum levels of lipid profile. Due to the significance of this matter on hand, we centralized our aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to interrogate the effect of magnesium supplementation on serum levels of total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in the general population aged ≥ 18 years.

Methods

In line with conducting this study first, relevant articles were found through searching databases, including five databases: Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed until January 2024. Following fulfilling the first aim, their mean differences and standard deviations were calculated to conduct the meta-analysis. Ultimately, an assessment of the statistical heterogeneity of intervention effects was performed using I-squared statistics and Cochran's Q test.

Results

Regarding serum levels of TC, TG, LDL-C, and HDL-C, twenty-one, twenty-three, twenty, and twenty-five studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled estimates showed no significant differences in serum levels of TC, TG, and LDL-C between the magnesium group and comparison group (weighted mean difference (WMD) = 0.34 mg/dl, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.75 to 2.43, P = 0.749, I2 = 99.1%; WMD=-2.06 mg/dl, 95% CI: -6.35 to 2.23, P = 0.346, I2 = 99.1; WMD = 1.71 mg/dl, 95% CI: -0.81 to 4.24, P = 0.183, I2 = 99.4, respectively). However, magnesium significantly increased HDL-C (WMD = 1.21 mg/dl, 95% CI: 0.58 to 1.85, P 2 = 99.5).

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study showed that magnesium significantly increased HDL-C levels. However, due to high heterogeneity, we must note that more research is needed to make robust recommendations regarding magnesium supplementation in clinical practice.

Registry number

This study was registered in PROSPERO under the protocol number CRD42024505142.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY-NC-ND).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.