Long-term effect of repeated low-level red light therapy on myopia control: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Ullah S, Umer MF, Chandran SP
European journal of ophthalmology · 2 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Health markers and function
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2025-02-21 · Eur J Ophthalmol · vol. 35 · issue 4 · pp. 1432–1444
- Publisher
- SAGE Publishing
- Cited
- 4 citations · more than 71% of similar papers · 1.1× the field average
- References
- 56 works
- Access
- Paywalled
- Research areas
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies · Corneal surgery and disorders · Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Keywords
- Meta-analysis, Random effects model, Study heterogeneity, Medicine, Confidence interval, Publication bias, Ophthalmology, Optometry, Internal medicine
- MeSH
- humans, myopia, refraction, ocular, eyeglasses, visual acuity, child, axial length, eye, low-level light therapy
3 authors
From MY, SA
- Saif UllahLincoln University College
- Muhammad Farooq UmerKing Faisal University
- Suriyakala Perumal Chandran · correspondingLincoln University College
Abstract
IntroductionMyopia is a refractive error where distant objects are not clearly seen and appear blurred. Goal of this study was to evaluate long-term effectiveness of Repeated Low-Level Red Light (RLRL) therapy for children with myopia, which primarily focused on Axial length (AL) and Spherical Equivalent Refraction (SER) as primary endpoints.MethodsThe research compared outcomes between RLRL treatment with Single Vision Spectacles (SVS) for childhood myopia management. We performed a systematic literature search in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases using "Myopia" and " Repeated Low-Level Red Light ". Mean differences (MD) were estimated and the effects of therapies measured. Publication bias and heterogeneity analysis were carried out by Inverted Precision Effect Test-Precision Effect Estimate Standard Error (PET-PEESE) (and subsequent Search Sequential Analysis) and Tau test. Bayesian meta-analysis was performed using Jaffrey Amazing Statistical Package (JASP).ResultsThis meta-analysis comprised 1,714 participants: 824 in RLRL and 890 in SVS group. Pooled effect size for AL reduction was 0.953 ± 0.294, (95% credible interval (CI) 0.775 to 0.980). Pooled effect size for SER reduction was 1.521 ± 0.662 (95% CI 0.102 to 2.736). PET-PEESE analysis revealed no significant publication bias (p-value 0.407). Random effects models were employed for presence of significant heterogeneity (3.9 and 5.7 for AL; 5.7 for SER), alongside degree of variation (0.828 & 1.665) for Tau (τ), which estimates the between-study variance.ConclusionLong-term observations indicate that RLRL treatment significantly influences myopia management, leading to considerable reductions in both AL and SER. Additional research is essential to investigate potential long-term rebound effects.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.